(string-append (current-source-directory)
"/../..")))
which covers my two needs, but it just feels ridiculously. Is there no
easy and reliable way to get the path of the current script in guile?
Best,
Reza
Attila Lendvai writes:
> not sure, but this may be relevant:
>
> (current-filename) is #f when guix pull'ing
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55464
Yes seems to be the same or a similar issue but the workaround also
looks kinda ugly ;)
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:
> Hi,
>
> first let me have a meta comment. Your client seems to embed \r
> characters (0x0D, CR) into your emails. Not sure if that is
> intentional.
Not really, but it makes me wonder what is causing this, I am using
notmuch with emac
Hi,
Because I stumbled on one (which I still don't understand)
(repl-version 0 1 1)
(exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S")
(value (channel)) (value #f))
Context: I have a package with its own channel which by itself builds
fine. When I include this package
Hi Attila
> dear Guix,
>
> my ultimate goal is to run Home Assistant (a python based service)
> from Shepherd.
I have a not yet running attempt of home assistant packaged, maybe you
would like to have a stab at it?
> packaging it seems to be too much effort, so i looked into running it in a
> `
On Wednesday, August 31, 2022, Liliana Marie Prikler <
liliana.prik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 31.08.2022 um 09:26 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> > Hi,
> >
> > guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> >
> > > civodul pushed a commit to branch master
> > > in repository guix.
> > >
> > > commi
Good question, maybe we should just do that. Thoughts?
What about size? Does this not bloat up profile sizes?
--
Reza Housseini
This message is signed with my GnuPG key:
C0F3 0812 9AF2 80F4 0830 C2C1 C375 C6AF 0512 5C52
OpenPGP_0xC375C6AF05125C52.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Hi
Poetry is not building on ci.guix.gnu.org [1]. There is a pending patch
[2] on the issue tracker. What is missing to apply this patch and how
can I help?
Cheers,
Reza
[1] https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=poetry
[2] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63139
--
Reza Housseini
This message is
sible to reconfigure your system or your home.
It may be a rational choice depending on your set of personal constraints.
I'm playing with the idea of doing that for a while now, but I fear this
adds another layer of complexity I'm not prepared to handle right now.
Thanks for t
quot;open-file") (value "~A: ~S") (value ("No
such file or directory" "VERSION")) (value (2)))
How can I achieve this?
Thanks for your input!
Best,
Reza
[1]
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2023/from-development-environments-to-continuous-integrationthe-ultim
ioned on
the page, are there any attempts at packaging some of the software e.g.
microblog.pub?
--
Reza Housseini
This message is signed with my GnuPG key:
C0F3 0812 9AF2 80F4 0830 C2C1 C375 C6AF 0512 5C52
OpenPGP_0xC375C6AF05125C52.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_sign
pt
and everything gets configured appropriately, or at least the default setup
is as secure as possible.
Thanks for any insights.
Cheers, Reza
om Cuirass to support your
> needs?
>
>
> Cheers,
> simon
>
>
Hi Phil
I am also really interested in this topic, where did you host the package
definition? Is it in the same repo as the source code?
@zimoun I would also prefer to use Cuirass, could you sketch a similar
setup with Cuirass?
Cheers,
Reza
settings? etc..
Kind regards,
Reza
On 3/29/22 16:15, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Hi,
I'm digging on old compiler versions for bootstrapping purposes and I realized
that gcc 4.7 and 4.8 packages don't compile on x64.
We have been able to reproduce the failure of gcc 4.7 but we didn't test
Looks like a bug in gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712
You probably have to patch gcc 4.* as it was only backported until gcc 5.5
On 3/29/22 21:01, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
And you try to compile that using `guix build -m manifest.scm` the compilation
fails. The same happens
Did you try to use guix time-machine and compile 4.7 from there? Perhaps
the issue is the glibc version?
On 3/30/22 21:32, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Hi Reza,
On Wednesday, March 30th, 2022 at 9:27 PM, Reza Housseini
wrote:
Looks like a bug in gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
Hi Guixers,
I'd like to donate this used machine [1] to the guix project. Is there
any interest and when yes can I advice the seller to send the machine
directly to the build farm hoster?
Thanks for the great project.
Kind regards,
Reza
[1]
https://www.ebay-kleinanzeigen.de/s-an
?
What's its condition overall? Will it die after a few weeks? :D
On April 27, 2022 9:03:36 AM GMT+02:00, Reza Housseini
wrote:
Hi Guixers,
I'd like to donate this used machine [1] to the guix project. Is there any
interest and when yes can I advice the seller to send the machin
On 4/27/22 14:38, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
Hello Julien and Reza,
Thanks for the donation! We already have two Overdrive 1000 connected to
the build farm behind ci.guix.gnu.org (overdrive1 and dover
machines). Adding an extra one, and have it hosted at your place Julien
would be great :).
You
agine more fine grained splitting, for example test and
documentation dependencies in separate profiles or even unit test and
integration test dependencies split into separate profiles.
At the moment I see no possibilities for even the "easy" use case I
mentioned first.
Cheers,
Reza
edule for the
removals, then bang purge.
I don't see the problem, python 2 was sunsetting in 2020(!) [1] after a
prolongation from 2015, so it should not come as a surprise.
Cheers,
Reza
[1] https://www.python.org/doc/sunset-python-2/
--
Reza Housseini
This message is signed with my
This is probably down to a top level circular dependency. In particular,
trying to paraview to compute the version to form part of the
native-search-path at the top level causes problems.
I'm wondering why it builds fine locally but causes problems in QA have
you any pointers what might be the
Hi List
I wanted to install python-sphinx-gallery but deep down in the
dependency list v4l-utils is failing [1]. Locally it builds fine
therefore I assume the build only needs to be restarted.
Thanks,
Reza
[1] https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2030706/details
--
Reza Housseini
This message is
Hi Christopher
I submitted a new revision to the issue, but the QA link shows
Issue not found
This could mean the issue does not exist, it has no patches or has been
closed.
do you know what the problem is here?
Thanks for your help,
Best,
Reza
Hi Guixers
Just stumbled upon this recently discovered supply chain attack on xz,
inserting a backdoor via test files [1, 2]. And it made me wondering,
what would have been the effects on guix and how can we potentially
avoid it?
Stay safe!
Reza
[1] https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss
than just
upgrading the version number.
[1]: https://github.com/easymodo/qimgv
--
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
https://www.pantherx.org/
s the next step?
--
Ali Reza Hayati
www.alirezahayati.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey Florizan,
thanks for advice.
I'll report back. I just joined the mailing list and email the team
leader. If I don't hear back, I'll let you all know.
On 8/4/20 9:38 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:57:37PM -0400, Amin Bandali wrote:
>>
Bandali wrote:
>>> Hi Ali Reza,
>>>
>>> Ali Reza Hayati writes:
>>>
>>>> Hey guys.
>>>> I hope you all are well.
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to contribute to GNU and Guix but I'm not a programmer so I
>>>>
ly primary group is detected as group for service user.
I assume that that this might be a bug on group assignment for service
user. or I might missed something in service definition.
kind regards,
Reza
--
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
https://www.pantherx.org/
-service-type
(const
%kyc-accounts
...
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
--
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
https://www.pantherx.org/
e
sh-5.0$ groups
kyc-service
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
--
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
https://www.pantherx.org/
---cut here---start->8---
root@panther ~# su - test
-bash-5.0$ groups
testgrp users wheel
-bash-5.0$ screen -r test-service
sh-5.0$ groups
users
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
--
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
https://www.pantherx.org/
sues.guix.info/41573
Glad to hear about that, I assume this could fix my issue, so I just
need to wait for next release of Shepherd.
Regards,
Reza
--
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
https://www.pantherx.org/
qt-activation))
(default-value (lxqt-desktop-configuration))
(description "Run the LXQt desktop environment.")))
--8<-------cut here---end--->8---
Kind regards,
Reza
--
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
https://www.pantherx.org/
was thinking of was to add these configurations, to
the related `$XDG_CONFIG_DIRS` path in system profile located in
`/run/current-system/profile/etc/xdg/...` just don't know which service
extension I should extend for this purpose.
Thanks,
Reza
--
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
https://www.pantherx.org/
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:11:42 +0430
Reza Alizadeh Majd wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> working on a service definition for LXQt desktop, I need to perform a
> series of default configurations. for example to set the window
> manager, prepare default panel, set the default theme,
...@pantherx.org.
The bounty results will be published to the community and whoever does that
gets the full credit.
At the end just wanted to mention The bounty is really just a motivation that
hopefully benefits the whole community.
---
Regards
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
Hi,
I had prepare a package for `gitlab-runner`:
https://docs.gitlab.com/runner/
but I'm not sure about the right place to submit regarding
patch. is the `gnu/packages/ci.scm` is a good location to
submit this package?
--
Regards
Reza Alizadeh Majd
PantherX Team
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019, at 1:07 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
>
> "Reza Alizadeh Majd" skribis:
>
> > I had prepare a package for `gitlab-runner`:
> > https://docs.gitlab.com/runner/
> >
> > but I'm not sure about the right place t
40 matches
Mail list logo