Hey all of you,
I'm still interested. I go by teddd on IRC. I'll write you there Ludo.
Cheers,
Théo
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022, 16:01 Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Simon, Théo, Kaelyn,
>
> Simon Streit skribis:
>
> > Théo Maxime Tyburn writes:
> >> It is here https://github.com/theottm/emacs-guix-cl
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023, 01:37 Csepp wrote:
>
> Théo Maxime Tyburn writes:
>
> > Csepp writes:
> >
> >> Théo Maxime Tyburn writes:
> >>
> >>> ```
> >>> checking for OpenEXR >= 1.0.6... no
> >>> [...]
> >>> Delegate library configuration:
> >>> OpenEXR --with-openexr=yes no
> >>
Hi there,
I'm trying to package Incudine, a Music/DSP programming environment for
Common Lisp. I'm stuck with the binding of libsndfile. First
libsndfile.so could not be found, but I fixed the paths like it is
commonly done in other CL packages. Next problem is that somehow the
bindings are not wo
Oh, it seems I took the WARNING message for an ERROR message.
The error message seems to just be:
> Unhandled UIOP/LISP-BUILD:COMPILE-FILE-ERROR in thread # tid=21 "main thread" RUNNING
> {100AFE8113}>:
> COMPILE-FILE-ERROR while
> compili
For some weird reasons I manage to compile this reluctant file in an
interactive session by accepting the error in the debugger and retrying
compilation later on when the compiled file is required.
Not sure in what retrying a compilation on the interactive debugger is
different from compiling norm
Christopher Baines writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Hey,
>
> PackagingCon [1] is happening in Berlin on the 26th to the 28th of
> October, and the Reproducible Builds summit is happening in Hamburg on
> the 31st of October to the 2nd of November.
>
> 1: https://packaging-con.org/
> 2:
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 28.09.2023 um 12:23 + schrieb Théo Tyburn:
>> Oh, it seems I took the WARNING message for an ERROR message.
>>
>> The error message seems to just be:
>> > Unhandled UIOP/LISP-BUILD:COMPILE-FILE-ERROR in th
Hi, sure. Note that here the installation is narrowed to the asd system
"cl-sndfile". But you could add or replace it by "incudine".
> (define-public sbcl-incudine
> (let ((commit "21c99e4fe1b152c125a1bc6df915759b46cdab78")
> (revision "1"))
> (package
> (name "sbcl-incudine")
>
That's interesting. I was also suspicious about this function and mentioned it
upstream but they said it is normal to do it like this so I just ignored it.
Also I remember having tried out a dummy package, so I really believed it was
ok.
Thanks for your help!
On October 23, 2023 10:44:57 AM GM
