Re: Contribute to Guix

2025-03-15 Thread Cayetano Santos
>jeu. 13 mars 2025 at 23:49, João Mauricio wrote: > Please answer this email about what I can do to start and what is needed. Welcome abroad ! Following my experience: get a feeling about guix by using it, as system or as foreign, replacing your current sw / workflows with what guix provides (

Re: Packaging golang applications - multi-stage build?

2025-03-15 Thread Hilton Chain
On Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:11:56 +0800, Carlo Zancanaro wrote: > > Hi Hilton, > > Before I respond to your specific concerns, I just want to clarify my > aim. > > I'm not trying to say "all Go code should be packaged like this", I'm > just trying to come up with a practical way to update applications w

Re: [bug#76503] [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

2025-03-15 Thread Divya Ranjan
Suhail Singh writes: > Divya Ranjan writes: > >> I had to realize that Linux gets a *lot* more in funding and >> infrastructure than Guix. > > While I agree in general, I don't understand the specific point you were > making. Was it that Linux with its greater funding has someone to > manage so

Re: user shepherd gets started how?

2025-03-15 Thread Rutherther
Hello, I am just ordinary user of guix, shepherd, I never contributed to shepherd, but I still think I can answer some of your questions or explain design: > Hi, > How does my user ("dannym")'s shepherd (and user dbus--probably by > shepherd?) get started? (I'm using guix home--if it's impor

Patch application workflows

2025-03-15 Thread Ian Eure
Hi folks, I’ve had issues getting a reliable patch review/push workflow going, and would like to hear what others are doing for this. Specific issues I’d like to solve: * `mumi am' sometimes claims not to find patches. This just happened to me: guix!env!ieure:~/projects/guix/staging$ mum

guix pull from private ssh server fails

2025-03-15 Thread Christoph Buck
Hi Guix! I hope you have a good day! The other day i ran into a problem as i was pulling a guix channel from my private ssh server secured by pubkey authentication. The channel file looks like this: > (channel > (name 'grimbard) > (url "ssh://t...@xx..xx:/srv/ssh/guix/grimbard.gi

Re: Contribute to Guix

2025-03-15 Thread Cayetano Santos
>sam. 15 mars 2025 at 16:47, João Mauricio wrote: First, always reply to all. Avoid top posting. > I saw a package that is really old, the browser midori > the current version is 14.5 while in the guix repository it is version 9 Then, check non up to date packages with, for example: guix

Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform

2025-03-15 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Vagrant Cascadian writes: > On 2025-03-13, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> Just pushed a "wip-linux-libre-arm64-mnt-reform" branch that contains a >> kernel for the MNT/Reform family of systems. >> >> I have successfully built and booted a linux-libre-arm64-mnt-reform@6.12 >> kernel on a "MNT Reform2

Re: bug#76503: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

2025-03-15 Thread Vivien Kraus
Hello, I have only distantly followed the discussion, but this triggers a reaction from me: Le vendredi 14 mars 2025 à 22:45 +0100, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : > and patch tracking to Codeberg, >   a “modern” forge hosted by a non-profit. I would have written “a web-based forge” or web-firt or web

Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform

2025-03-15 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:37:09 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > I have successfully built and booted a > linux-libre-arm64-mnt-reform@6.12 kernel on a "MNT Reform2 with RCORE > RK3588 Module" ... running Debian, I know... but Guix System cannot > be too far off! In theory it also supports the o

Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform

2025-03-15 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:49:14 +0100 Simon Josefsson via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." wrote: > + (bootloader (bootloader-configuration > + ;; Due to FSDG issues with the DDR training binaries, > we cannot > + ;; currently ship u-boot in gui

Re: Numerical problem (compiling python-numba package)

2025-03-15 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Emmanuel, On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 09:42, Emmanuel Medernach wrote: > AssertionError: when comparing [0.60858395 0.54922627 0.57440088] and > [0.60858395 0.54922627 0.57440088]: 0.549226270051226 != 0.5492262700512262 > > More generally this asks the question about reproducibility of numerica

Re: mumi CLI now supports tagging

2025-03-15 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Arun Isaac writes: > Hi Noé, > > The new open/closed indicator badges and separation of open/closed > issues is now online. I'm happy to hear your feedback and tweak it a > bit. > Looks great, thanks! >>> Also, implementing sorting on the list is difficult to do, especially >>> with the new rel

Re: mumi CLI now supports tagging

2025-03-15 Thread Arun Isaac
Hi Ricardo, > We can record the original numeric time stamp in a "data-" attribute > and use JavaScript to sort by that data attribute on the client. (In > the past I've used listjs[1] for this, which is likely overkill here.) > > [1]: https://github.com/javve/list.js Good find, and a good sugg

Re: How to move forward about Rust? antioxidant, cargo2guix, etc.

2025-03-15 Thread Hilton Chain
I have made the following changes (currently locally): - New procedure ‘cargo-inputs’. (cargo-inputs NAME) returns a copy of (@ (gnu packages rust-crates) NAME-cargo-inputs), with #f removed and symbols resolved to (@ (gnu packages rust-sources) SYMBOL). Both modules can be configured via k

Re: Scaling issues with forges Was: Trying out Codeberg

2025-03-15 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 17:26:07 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > And only using GPL2 is part of that. It's a pragmatic choice in favor > of the goals of Linux's leadership team, which are different from > GNU's goals. Of course, Linux couldn't feasibly change to GPL3 > because their copyright licensing mo

Re: bug#76503: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

2025-03-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Vivien, Vivien Kraus skribis: > Le vendredi 14 mars 2025 à 22:45 +0100, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : >> and patch tracking to Codeberg, >>   a “modern” forge hosted by a non-profit. > > I would have written “a web-based forge” or web-firt or web-oriented or > web-facing… here instead of modern w

Re: bug#76503: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

2025-03-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > From my personal experiences with Debian, it looks to me possible to do > both systems for a long time, but the extent of the downsides are > unclear to me. I’d say that the main downsides of having two systems, for new/occasional contributors would be confusion (whe