Re: Insights for future development from the Guix Survey

Hi jbranso, jbra...@dismail.de writes: >> In general, the current work-flow and ethos within the team seems to favour >> incremental changes. Perhaps it's due to being volunteer-driven but I've >> seen multiple big patch-sets get to about 90% and then never make it over >> the line. >> >> The

Survey Results: Pinging Neglected Patches (was: Survey: Pinging Neglected Patches)

Hi Guix, In this message are the results of the above survey. In total, there were 22 complete responses to this survey (LimeSurvey would only have allowed a total of 25 on a free plan anyway), and 13 'incomplete' ones (seems like it counted people who clicked on the survey but didn't fill it). S

Re: Insights for future development from the Guix Survey

45mg <45mg.wri...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm thinking this could help collect unreviewed work in one place so > that everyone who wants to can see it. For your situational awareness, note that one such place already exists to an extent today. The usertag "patch-review-hackers-list" has been used b

Re: Insights for future development from the Guix Survey

jbra...@dismail.de writes: > What is "patch-review-hackers-list" ? Can you send me some documentation > on how to use it? It's one of a few tags that the london guix meetup has used in the past. See for details, including other re

Re: Insights for future development from the Guix Survey

January 27, 2025 at 12:35 PM, "Suhail Singh" mailto:suhailsingh...@gmail.com?to=%22Suhail%20Singh%22%20%3Csuhailsingh247%40gmail.com%3E > wrote: > > 45mg <45mg.wri...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I'm thinking this could help collect unreviewed work in one place so > > that everyone who want