FOSDEM + Guix Days blog post

Hello Guix! I’ve posted a draft blog post about FOSDEM + Guix Days, to be published on Monday or Tuesday (before the next post about the user & contributor survey). It’s in under drafts/ (I can’t post a link to a web rendering because cgit

FOSDEM + Guix Days blog post

Hello Guix! I’ve posted a draft blog post about FOSDEM + Guix Days, to be published on Monday or Tuesday (before the next post about the user & contributor survey). It’s in under drafts/ (I can’t post a link to a web rendering because cgit

Re: Common Lisp packaging conventions

Hi Guillaume, > Usually we make a single package and declare which ASDF systems to > compile with the 'asd-systems' keyword in the arguments field (so the > option 1 in your list). Thanks for your input! Since that's the easiest solution for me as a packager, I won't complain :-) > However if an

Re: Guix org on Codeberg

Hi Luis, Luis Felipe skribis: > I'm not a committer but would like to share the following icons that > you could use for the organization and for the mirror repository: > > https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/media/2025/01/guix.png > https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/media/2025/01/guix-mirror.png > https:

Moving ruby@2 packages to guix-past?

I was trying to get devdocs working properly in a branch, and since it probably requires updating the whole Ruby world in Guix, I was wondering about some changes. One of them is about the EOL ruby packages. The following packages from Guix have reached their EOL : ruby@2.6, ruby@2.7, ruby@3.0

Re: Guix Consensus Document process (v10)

Hello Simon, Simon Tournier skribis: > Please find the version v10 [1]: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736#81 > > Somehow, I tried to include the various comments. Thanks all! The > outcome appears to me in good shape. WDYT? > > Ready for deliberation? More minor comments before the f

Re: Moving ruby@2 packages to guix-past?

Nicolas Graves writes: > I was trying to get devdocs working properly in a branch, and since it > probably requires updating the whole Ruby world in Guix, I was wondering > about some changes. I was looking into this a few months ago, but ran out of spare time to continue the investigation. Tha

Re: Moving ruby@2 packages to guix-past?

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 10:51:52PM +0100, Nicolas Graves wrote: > Since they are packaged but shouldn't be recommended, my solution would > be to move them from guix to the guix-past channel. Is that the right > thing to do ? Yes, if they are not used in Guix and they are no longer supported upstr