Hello,
Is it too late to have this team having an id name 'cpp' rather than
'c++'?
As a fan of regex its use of the almighty plus sign has wrankled me.
Also, as an outsider Ive always considered cpp to be representative of
both C and C++, rather than a subset.
Thanks,
Jonathan
On 2024-12-0
Am Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 08:27:25AM + schrieb indieterminacy:
> Is it too late to have this team having an id name 'cpp' rather than 'c++'?
> As a fan of regex its use of the almighty plus sign has wrankled me.
> Also, as an outsider Ive always considered cpp to be representative of both
> C and
Fabio,
Thanks for leading this initiative.
I guess your ambitions go beyond just making London a Guix hub :)
Id encourage you to mention the assembly to the TXR mailinglist:
https://www.kylheku.com/txr-users/
While this Lisp flavour is lacking in numbers its designs and practices
are exemplary
Dear All,
tl;dr: This is to let you know that I've registered a Lisp assembly at
38c3. I'm currently reaching out to various Lisp-related communities to
see if anyone is also attending 38c3 and might be interested in joining
the assembly.
More context:
38c3 is the 38th edition of the Chaos Commu
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.12.2024 um 18:35 -0500 schrieb Greg Hogan:
> v2 below. Removed compiler (llvm[-meta].scm) scope and removed
> "compilers" from description.
>
> +1 to an LLVM team or llvm[-meta].scm in the core-packages scope.
>
> I think cmake-build-system belongs in the C++ team scope. Our