Come speak at the Guix Social meetup

2024-06-04 Thread Steve George
Hi, We're looking for speakers - of any level - to give talks at the Guix online meetup. We're a small, friendly group at all levels of experience. Talks can be about anything Guix associated, for example: - Experiences using or learning Guix - Particular commands or capabilities - deploying VM

Re: Call for contribution to the Guix infrastructure

2024-06-04 Thread Carlo Zancanaro
Hi Ludo, On Fri, May 24 2024, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > • Day-to-day system administration > > We’re also looking for people who’d be willing to have SSH access to > some of the infrastructure to help with day-to-day maintenance: > restarting a build, restarting the occasional service

Re: Autodafe is "production" ready

2024-06-04 Thread jbranso
June 2, 2024 at 5:39 PM, "Eric S. Raymond" wrote: > > jbra...@dismail.de : > > > > > Hey Guix! > > > > > > > > Have you heard about autodafe? I just did today. > > > > > > > > So it looks like autodafe (1) converts autotools into > > > > simple makefiles. Quoting from it's hacke

Re: Come speak at the Guix Social meetup

2024-06-04 Thread Ekaitz Zarraga
On 2024-06-04 10:19, Steve George wrote: Hi, We're looking for speakers - of any level - to give talks at the Guix online meetup. We're a small, friendly group at all levels of experience. Talks can be about anything Guix associated, for example: - Experiences using or learning Guix - Particu

Re: Postmortem of service downtime

2024-06-04 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Ludo, On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 19:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > From Sunday May 19th to Tuesday may 21st, for about 36h, > bayfront.guix.gnu.org, the machine behind many services went down: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-guix/2024-05/msg0.html > > Affected web sites and servic

Re: "guix pack -f docker" does too much work

2024-06-04 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Sat, 01 Jun 2024 at 15:58, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> I think it would be great if "guix pack -f docker" could avoid building >> all these identical layers again and again. Perhaps it would be >> possible to have a single derivation for each layer? This way we >> wouldn't have to recreat