On Sat 01 Jun 2024 15:58, Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> I think it would be great if "guix pack -f docker" could avoid building
>> all these identical layers again and again. Perhaps it would be
>> possible to have a single derivation for each layer? This way we
>> wouldn't have to recreate the sa
On 2024-06-02 19:02:46 +, jbra...@dismail.de wrote:
> Hey Guix!
>
> Have you heard about autodafe? I just did today.
>
> So it looks like autodafe (1) converts autotools into
> simple makefiles. Quoting from it's hacker's guide (2):
> "The proximate goal of this project is to eliminate autotoo
currently if I click on the QA button of the issues UI for Guix the QA
page would show
An error occurred
Sorry about that!
wrong-type-arg
Hi Leo,
guix-comm...@gnu.org skribis:
> commit 5d3edff1a604414a3c42b89fcbc007e9d573993d
> Author: Leo Famulari
> AuthorDate: Sun Jun 2 16:48:44 2024 -0400
>
> gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.9.
>
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-version, linux-libre-gnu-revision,
> linux-li
