On 2024-04-16 01:17, spacecadet wrote:
> Hi Nicolas
>
>> Isn't what you're trying to do already in Guix? Have a look at
>> package-inputs-rewrite right there :
>> https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Defining-Package-Variants.html
>
> I want to have this but more powerful, I'd like to do
Hi Nicolas
Isn't what you're trying to do already in Guix? Have a look at
package-inputs-rewrite right there :
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Defining-Package-Variants.html
I want to have this but more powerful, I'd like to do something like
define an operating system with all
In the code there, the function propagate-packages will indeed try and
propagate every package through the graph node.
I looked at your code, it's comprehensive. I wasn't sure such a thing
was possible with input rewriting, although I think there's still a lot
of benefit to the functional approa
When recently taking a look at diffoscope, I was reminded that there is
effectively no default openjdk version, you have to pick a specific
version for each package definition...
At some time in diffoscope's history, that was openjdk@12.
But there are quite a few versions to choose from:
guix
Currently, most java packages use the implicit jdk from the build system (ant-
or maven-build-system), which is… icedtea@8. We still have quite a lot of old
packages that don't build with openjdk9, so I'm not sure when we can update the
default jdk…
Le 16 avril 2024 22:25:33 GMT+02:00, Vagrant
> Currently, most java packages use the implicit jdk from the build
> system (ant- or maven-build-system), which is… icedtea@8. We still
> have quite a lot of old packages that don't build with openjdk9, so
> I'm not sure when we can update the default jdk…
does that prevent the introduction of a
On 2024-04-16, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Currently, most java packages use the implicit jdk from the build
> system (ant- or maven-build-system), which is… icedtea@8. We still
> have quite a lot of old packages that don't build with openjdk9, so
> I'm not sure when we can update the default jdk…
Bu
Makes sense, we can do that.
Le 16 avril 2024 23:50:54 GMT+02:00, Vagrant Cascadian
a écrit :
>On 2024-04-16, Julien Lepiller wrote:
>> Currently, most java packages use the implicit jdk from the build
>> system (ant- or maven-build-system), which is… icedtea@8. We still
>> have quite a lot of o
Hi everyone,
Apologies for the long delay on this.
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:07 PM, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am proposing patch#63393 [1] which adds the output lib to
> gcc-toolchain. Well, quoting the comment:
>
> ;; The main raison d'être of this "meta-package" is (1) to conve
Hi Guix,
On some languages, there are a lot of unused native-inputs that are
development & linting dependencies much more than packages that are
actually used to build or test a package (I'm thinking at least Python
and Rust). These fall in the category of tools "useful" at run time, but
unecess
10 matches
Mail list logo
