xz backdoor

2024-04-01 Thread Reza Housseini
Hi Guixers Just stumbled upon this recently discovered supply chain attack on xz, inserting a backdoor via test files [1, 2]. And it made me wondering, what would have been the effects on guix and how can we potentially avoid it? Stay safe! Reza [1] https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-securi

Re: xz backdoor

2024-04-01 Thread Kaelyn
Hi Reza, On Monday, April 1st, 2024 at 12:46 PM, Reza Housseini wrote: > > > Hi Guixers > > Just stumbled upon this recently discovered supply chain attack on xz, > inserting a backdoor via test files [1, 2]. And it made me wondering, > what would have been the effects on guix and how can we

Re: xz backdoor

2024-04-01 Thread jbranso
April 1, 2024 at 3:46 PM, "Reza Housseini" wrote: > > Hi Guixers > > Just stumbled upon this recently discovered supply chain attack on xz, > > inserting a backdoor via test files [1, 2]. And it made me wondering, > > what would have been the effects on guix and how can we potentially >

Re: xz backdoor

2024-04-01 Thread Attila Lendvai
> The quick summary is that Guix currently shouldn't be affected > because a) Guix currently packages xz 5.2.8, which predates the > backdoor, and b) the backdoor includes checks based on absolute > paths e.g. under /usr and Guix executable paths generally don't > match the patterns checked for.

Re: Emacs and Gnome branches are merged now

2024-04-01 Thread Attila Lendvai
just a heads' up: after pulling the gnome changes i was unable to log in (empty screen with frozen pointer after the password). `herd restart elogind` can be used to get back to the login screen. i could fix it using the following steps: 1. move away my ~/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/

Re: xz backdoor

2024-04-01 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 09:46:12PM +0200, Reza Housseini wrote: > Just stumbled upon this recently discovered supply chain attack on xz, > inserting a backdoor via test files [1, 2]. And it made me wondering, what > would have been the effects on guix and how can we potentially avoid it? There's a

Re: Error handling when 'guix substitute' dies

2024-04-01 Thread Philip McGrath
Hi, On 3/29/24 11:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > [...] OK, I’ll push it shortly, but… Lars Bilke skribis: thanks Ada for bringing this issue up again. I get the same error on `guix pull` almost always when I am on my enterprise network. Re-running `guix pull` a second time also almost alway