Hi Josselin,
Thanks for getting back to me.
On 2024-03-02, 22:23 +0100, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> I have a patch locally upgrading Grub, but it's not in upstreaming
> shape yet and I haven't had much time to work on it recently. I am
> running it though, and it's working quite well. Would anyon
Hi Maxim,
On 2024-03-02, 22:08 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Is there something preventing us from updating GRUB to benefit from
> full LUKS2 support?
That I don't know.
There seems to be a patch that updates to GRUB 2.12 already, see other
message in this thread. If the patch can be made ups
From: Josselin Poiret
* gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm (grub): Update to 2.12.
Change-Id: I5d9ae3952b61b47418cb571fc0bcb5318e72
---
gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm | 182 ---
1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/bootloaders
From: Josselin Poiret
* gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm (grub-minimal, grub-coreboot, grub-efi32,
grub-hybrid): Use G-Exps.
(grub-efi): Use G-Exps. Also use OVMF to test.
Change-Id: Ic9c73753004739d6027b8426eb46c114a6a31051
---
gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm | 286 +++--
Hi Felix,
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." writes:
> Hi,
>
> We track bugs and patches separately. Does the distinction serve a
> purpose? May I combine them?
What do you mean by tracking them separately and combining them?
They're on two different
Hi Hartmut,
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Hi,
>
> I found an old and unfinished patch in my pile. It optimizes building
> with cmake by not building the test if "#:tests?" is false. (Basically
> it passes -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF/ON" depending on "#:tests?".)
>
> Is this of interest? Then I would take my
Hi,
Josselin Poiret writes:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
> distribution." writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We track bugs and patches separately. Does the distinction serve a
>> purpose? May I combine them?
>
> What do you mean by tracking them separately
