Konrad Hinsen writes:
> I found a simpler one, using a more recent Guix commit:
>
>guix time-machine --commit=7b0863f07a113caef26fea13909bd97d250b629e \
>-- pack -S /etc/ssl=etc/ssl --format=squashfs bash nss-certs
>
> Unfortunately, I have no idea how to debug this, as the image is
> con
Hi Oleg,
Small update to give you some numbers. Looking through gnu/packages/ I
found a total of 593 packages using the go-build-system. With guix
refresh -l, I find 1449 dependent packages. I am currently at commit
bed3a0b547a59f63b545db165e76ddd9af8bba1a. Take this as a rough estimate,
since I s
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> To those traveling to Brussels tomorrow: who’s in to meet in our lair,
> namely Au Bon Vieux Temps, on Wednesday evening/night? :-)
>
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.84832&mlon=4.35237#map=20/50.84832/4.35237&layers=Y
>
> I should be able to be there arou
Hi everyone,
Since we're a couple people working on core-updates at the same time, it
might be a good idea to coordinate a bit (of course, other volunteers
welcome :) ).
One conundrum we have for now: glibc 2.38 has a couple of new CVEs, and
we have three options:
1) change glibc to track the 2.3
I'll join you at some point :)
Le 31 janvier 2024 17:21:40 GMT+01:00, Christopher Baines a
écrit :
>
>Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> To those traveling to Brussels tomorrow: who’s in to meet in our lair,
>> namely Au Bon Vieux Temps, on Wednesday evening/night? :-)
>>
>>
>> https://www.openst
Hi Josselin,
On Wed, Jan 31 2024, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> One conundrum we have for now: glibc 2.38 has a couple of new CVEs
The authors describe CVE-2023-6246, which is probably the most serious
of the four vulnerabilities, as "significant" [1] and Red Bat ranks it
as "8.4 (HIGH)" under the ne
Hello,
Am Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:44:21PM +0100 schrieb Josselin Poiret:
> One conundrum we have for now: glibc 2.38 has a couple of new CVEs, and
> we have three options:
> 1) change glibc to track the 2.38 release branch → world rebuild.
> 2) graft glibc → bad user experience (and we're not supp
Dear guix,
Le mercredi 31 janvier 2024 à 10:19 -0800, Felix Lechner via
Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. a écrit :
> Either way, I'd appreciate if Eudev could please be fixed in this
> core-updates cycle. The fix has been available for more than half a
> year.
The eudev pa
On 2024-01-31, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> One conundrum we have for now: glibc 2.38 has a couple of new CVEs, and
> we have three options:
> 1) change glibc to track the 2.38 release branch → world rebuild.
> 2) graft glibc → bad user experience (and we're not supposed to graft
> outside of master).
Hi Vivien,
> The eudev package has been touched on gnome-team
I reviewed the patches but do not believe they solve Bug#63508 or
Bug#63787.
That issue, stated succinctly, arises because configure.ac sets the
Makefile variable $(udevrulesdir) to the store output [1] while custom
rules like mine [2
10 matches
Mail list logo
