Re: A different way to build GCC to overcome issues, especially with C++ for embedded systems

Hi Attila! i tried with your gcc … but it errors out with: $ make [ 1%] Linking ASM executable bs2_default.elf arm-none-eabi-gcc: error: nosys.specs: No such file or directory That file is located here: /gnu/store/…-newlib-arm-none-eabi-4.3.0/arm-none-eabi/lib/nosys.specs Hm, it might be n

Re: A different way to build GCC to overcome issues, especially with C++ for embedded systems

Hi Jean-Pierre! The arm-none-eabi target is not finished yet since I'm running into some issues when building Axoloti which depends on the (gnu packages embedded) toolchains and I'm trying to migrate it to use `cross-gcc-toolchain` but it is proving a bit difficult due to search paths but I'm tr

Re: A different way to build GCC to overcome issues, especially with C++ for embedded systems

TL;DR it's probably due to some cmake mess. and i gave up on compiling this; if i really want to, i'll do it in a debian chroot. > > i tried with your gcc … but it errors out with: > > > > $ make > > [ 1%] Linking ASM executable bs2_default.elf > > arm-none-eabi-gcc: error: nosys.specs: No such

A basic Shepherd bug?

Hi, I added the service below to my operating-system, and 'herd status' prints nothing but hangs. Is that a bug? Same on reboot. Thanks! Kind regards Felix * * * (service fcgiwrap-service-type (fcgiwrap-configuration (socket "tcp:localhost:3012")))

Some files in Guix lack in-file license notice, does that make them GPL-3.0-only?

Hi at least the following files from Guix source tree dir-locals.el configure.ac config-daemon.ac bootstrap README have neither copyright nor license information in them. I believe it prevents people from assuming that GPL v3 **or later** applies to those files. You know, t

Mixing GPL and non-copyleft code in source files

Hi I have some changes in my personal Guix fork that I'd like to contribute. I'd like the lines of code I authored to be dual-licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later and CC0-1.0. This is purely for personal reasons (as having a mere few dozens of lines in a project under CC0 causes no practical change t

Re: Some files in Guix lack in-file license notice, does that make them GPL-3.0-only?

Am Freitag, dem 22.12.2023 um 17:20 +0100 schrieb Wojtek Kosior via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.: > Hi > > at least the following files from Guix source tree > >     dir-locals.el >     configure.ac >     config-daemon.ac >     bootstrap >     README > > have neither

Re: Mixing GPL and non-copyleft code in source files

Hi Wojtek, On Fri, Dec 22 2023, Wojtek Kosior via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." wrote: > I'd like the lines of code I authored to be dual-licensed under > GPL-3.0-or-later and CC0-1.0. This is purely for personal reasons (as > having a mere few dozens of lines in a

status of (future of) Guix QA

Curious of the status of the future of Guix QA as package definition contributors rely on it for updating packages (sending patches to get accepted/committed) in guix...

Re: A basic Shepherd bug?

> I added the service below to my operating-system, and 'herd status' > prints nothing but hangs. Is that a bug? > > Same on reboot. Thanks! this has probably been fixed in: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/shepherd.git/commit/?id=9be0b7e6fbe3c2e743b5626f4dff7c7bf9becc16 but it hasn't reached

Re: Mixing GPL and non-copyleft code in source files

Thanks for the response > Could you publish your diffs elsewhere with an appropriate note that > they are also available under CC-0 from there? Well, that's more or less what I am already doing with a public git repo for my fork — except I'm not sure how an "appropriate note" would look like. Wh

Re: [bug#62153] Merging guix pack changes for Docker containers packaging

Hi Oleg, Apologies for not replying earlier. I occasionally get reminded of the fact that building single-layer images is a problem, but only now did I take the time to look more closely at the latest version of these patches. Oleg Pykhalov skribis: > I would like to merge 62153. After 64173

Re: Mixing GPL and non-copyleft code in source files

Hi Wojtek, On Fri, Dec 22 2023, Wojtek Kosior wrote: > I'm not sure how an "appropriate note" would look like. Where do you > imagine it? I would offer a chronological list of my downloadable contributions to Guix and place the following wording on top of the page: "I disagree with the licensi

Re: [bug#67261] [PATCH 3/3] images: Add orangepi-r1-plus-lts image.

On 2023-12-03, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:58:57AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2023-11-18, Herman Rimm wrote: >> > * gnu/local.mk: Register image. >> > * gnu/system/images/orangepi-r1-plus-lts-rk3328.scm: New file. >> > * gnu/system/install.scm (orangepi-r1-plus-lt