Hello
I find this interesting thing but I don't have an explanation. When
query the "references" of my Gnu Store item "sbcl", it shows that sbcl
references bash-mininal, as the following output shows:
# guix gc --references /gnu/store/sbbp9nvslqcf3bmcnz5wgxf2qpsi757
/gnu/store/6ncav55lbk5kqvw
Pan Xie skribis:
> Hello
>
> I find this interesting thing but I don't have an explanation. When query the
> "references" of my Gnu Store item "sbcl", it shows that sbcl references
> bash-mininal, as the following output shows:
>
> # guix gc --references /gnu/store/sbbp9nvslqcf3bmcnz5wgxf2qpsi757
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> Christopher Baines 写道：
>> it's not the most cost effective setup
>
> Has this been explained in more detail before?
Probably not, beid is currently a CPX51 Hetzner cloud server costing
€65.33 a month. This has been useful as it's enabled scaling the
resources dyn
This is also interesting for me, since I have created my first patch
for guix: adding libsurvive as a package.
Alex
> What's a good way to debug this, please?
in Geiser i usually get the proper error message:
M-x geiser
,m (gnu tests reconfigure)
,reload
> Where is my error?
good question! silently swallowing errors and warnings should be something that
is frown upon, and only ever employed when deemed r
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> That said, I wonder if this would really be more convenient than SSH’ing
> into the target machine and running the commands right there. Perhaps
> I’m missing something about the use case?
The use case is to have a development host where packages are built and
then p
Hi all,
Just a gentle reminder for tomorrow's hybrid Guix meetup! See you all
tomorrow! :-)
Regards,
Arun
> The next Guix London meetup is scheduled for Monday 11th December, 6 pm
> London time (UTC) onward. 😃🤖🌈💻 Join us in person or online, address
> and link below.
>
> - In person, from 6:00
Hi MSavoritias,
On Sun, Dec 10 2023, MSavoritias wrote:
> Do you think it would be ok to use a VPS? Or do we want a physical
> server at somebody's home?
It's a community question. Everyone knows about IRC, and it works
well. I'm not sure there is a "we want" for XMPP, even though the
protocol
Hi Attila,
On Sun, Dec 10 2023, Attila Lendvai wrote:
> M-x geiser
> ,m (gnu tests reconfigure)
Thanks for those hints! That yields
;;; compiling /lcl/lechner/guix/git/guix/scripts/system/reconfigure.scm
;;; compiled
/home/lechner/.cache/guile/ccache/3.0-LE-8-4.7/lcl/lechner/guix/git/guix/scri
> Hi Saku,
>
> Am Freitag, dem 08.12.2023 um 10:42 +0200 schrieb Saku Laesvuori:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm planning on refreshing Guix's haskell packages as my fix for
> > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66347 requires rebuilding all of them
> > anyway. Should I try to keep commits small with only one upda
On 12/10/23 16:43, Felix Lechner wrote:
Hi MSavoritias,
On Sun, Dec 10 2023, MSavoritias wrote:
Do you think it would be ok to use a VPS? Or do we want a physical
server at somebody's home?
It's a community question. Everyone knows about IRC, and it works
well. I'm not sure there is a "we w
Am Sonntag, dem 10.12.2023 um 17:28 +0200 schrieb Saku Laesvuori:
> > Hi Saku,
> >
> > Am Freitag, dem 08.12.2023 um 10:42 +0200 schrieb Saku Laesvuori:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm planning on refreshing Guix's haskell packages as my fix for
> > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66347 requires rebuildi
Le dimanche 10 décembre 2023 à 17:45 +0200, MSavoritias a écrit :
> > There is also a trust issue. For acceptance, we need bridging. For
> > bridging, we need policing. And for policing, we need people with
> > time.
>
> That's a good question yeah. Whether we want bridging that is.
> Personally
On 12/10/23 17:56, Vivien Kraus wrote:
Le dimanche 10 décembre 2023 à 17:45 +0200, MSavoritias a écrit :
There is also a trust issue. For acceptance, we need bridging. For
bridging, we need policing. And for policing, we need people with
time.
That's a good question yeah. Whether we want brid
Hi,
Christopher Baines writes:
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
>
>> Christopher Baines 写道：
>>> it's not the most cost effective setup
>>
>> Has this been explained in more detail before?
>
> Probably not, beid is currently a CPX51 Hetzner cloud server costing
> €65.33 a month. This has been use
> > Define "buildable" and "unbuildable".
>
>
> I used these definitions: a buildable commit does not have build
> failures (or at least no new ones). An unbuildable commit introduces
> new build failures (in this case a lot of them).
>
> Buildable commits are safe spots to land on with time-mac
Attila Lendvai writes:
>> I guess "required" here means that in some cases Guix's policy is to
>> prefer small commits over buildable commits (with the previous
>> definition). I at least don't see any technical reasons why it would be
>> required. The question then becomes whether that policy
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
writes:
> While executing meta-command:
> error: label: unbound variable
>
>> ,reload
>
> While this gives
>
> While executing meta-command:
> unknown file name for module #
>
> Also, what is a meta-command, please?
Hi,
On sam., 09 déc. 2023 at 11:54, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I think this underlines a collective failure to get our act together.
I do not consider a collective failure considering the payment for the
service. About the maintenance of such service, that’s another
question, IMHO. :-)
> Anywa
> > FWIW, this commit policy has always bothered me as a newcomer to
> > Guix. pretty much everywhere else it's a major offence against your
> > colleagues to commit something that breaks the build in any way.
>
>
> In the last few months I’ve repeatedly seen assertions in a similar
> style as th
On 12/10/23 18:20, Attila Lendvai wrote:
FWIW, this commit policy has always bothered me as a newcomer to
Guix. pretty much everywhere else it's a major offence against your
colleagues to commit something that breaks the build in any way.
In the last few months I’ve repeatedly seen assertions
Everyone with commit privileges should feel free to push these patches to
master if they seem okay. I won't be able to help today.
Leo
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023, at 00:35, Hilton Chain wrote:
> Hi Felix (and Leo, Cc-ed)
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:00:47 +0800,
> Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Gu
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:13:58 +0800,
Leo Famulari wrote:
>
> Everyone with commit privileges should feel free to push these patches to
> master if they seem okay. I won't be able to help today.
OK, I have applied "[PATCH 2/8] gnu: linux-libre 6.1: Update to 6.1.66." from
#67724 as 65334547674bdaeb
Hi,
On 12/10/23 4:04 PM, MSavoritias wrote:
On 12/10/23 17:56, Vivien Kraus wrote:
Le dimanche 10 décembre 2023 à 17:45 +0200, MSavoritias a écrit :
There is also a trust issue. For acceptance, we need bridging. For
bridging, we need policing. And for policing, we need people with
time.
I a
24 matches
Mail list logo
