Re: Proposal: Differentiate products more clearly (Cycle 01)

Hi, On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 21:23, Luis Felipe wrote: >> While the -ix and -ux endings have long traditions in the operating >> system space, the Guix name is already trademarked by someone else for >> that kind of software. [2] [...] >> [2] >> https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87948650&caseTy

October hybrid London Guix/Guile meetup

Hi all, The next London Guix meetup is scheduled for Monday 23rd October, 6 pm London time (i.e. UTC+0100) onward. 😃🤖🌈💻 Join us in person at 20 Farringdon Street, EC4A 4AB. BIG NEWS 😃: If you like, you can join us remotely from anywhere on the planet too, using the following link: https://meet

Re: [PATCH] web: Include merged_with in graphql .

Arun Isaac writes: >> Sorry, I missed this patch. I will apply it tonight. > > Done! > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/mumi.git/commit/?id=a89c5109963de0b5fd1f500ed2e2ede47728fdb4 > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/mumi.git/commit/?id=025fc600f1cb4c73042bf920aee3e07d5fb9c53a > > I

Re: Proposal: Differentiate products more clearly (Cycle 01)

Hi Luis, Luis Felipe writes: > This is a proposal to help differentiate Guix, the package manager, > from Guix System. This sounds like a good plan. > Background: As far as I understand, Guix was supposed to be GNU's > package manager, and GNU was supposed to be the operating system: two > p