Re: Proposal: Differentiate products more clearly (Cycle 01)

Hi, On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 00:15, Luis Felipe wrote: > This is a proposal to help differentiate Guix, the package manager, > from Guix System. I agree with this proposal. For what it is worth, I remember a discussion past year at 10 Years of Guix with researchers – interested by reproducible r

Re: [PATCH] web: Include merged_with in graphql .

Hi, Out of my curiosity, is this patch On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 at 09:59, Christopher Baines wrote: > * mumi/web/graphql.scm (): Include merged_with. > --- > mumi/web/graphql.scm | 12 +++- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) merged to Mumi? Is it still relevant? If it is al

Re: [PATCH] web: Include merged_with in graphql .

Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > Out of my curiosity, is this patch > > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 at 09:59, Christopher Baines wrote: >> * mumi/web/graphql.scm (): Include merged_with. >> --- >> mumi/web/graphql.scm | 12 +++- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > merged to

Re: [PATCH] web: Include merged_with in graphql .

Hi, Sorry, I missed this patch. I will apply it tonight. I am not usually subscribed to guix-devel. In the future, please Cc me on patches related to mumi. Thanks! Arun

Re: Guix Data Service can now poll for new revisions/branches

Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hi Christopher, > > Christopher Baines writes: > >> Hey, >> >> As has happened before in the past, at the moment we're not getting >> emails to guix-commits for the main guix.git repository. This impacts >> the data service instances as they use these emails to know wh

Re: Need people to help with kernel updates

Hi Leo, "Leo Famulari" writes: > On CI, at least the 6.5.6 kernel package was built: > > http://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/831643 The current iteration of updates[0] to: 4.14.327: longterm 4.19.296: longterm 5.10.198: longterm 5.15.135: longterm 5.4.258: longterm 6.1.57: longterm 6.5.7: stable se

Re: Proposal: Differentiate products more clearly (Cycle 01)

Hi, > 2018-01-17 · website: say what Guix is at the very top > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-01/msg00232.html Hey, that’s me! Naturally, I do agree that we need clearer product differentiation and your drafts are pretty and clear as always. On the other hand I’ve always f

Re: [guix_milan] Guix Milan first meetup

Hello everyone, Here is a summary of the first Guix Milan meeting. PARTICIPANTS We were five participants: - the two organisers - one person reached through this mailing list - one person from the Telegram group "Guix System Italia" (https://t.me/guixsd_ita) - one via personal email invitation

Re: Guix Survey (follow up on "How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?")

Hi, On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 at 12:29, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: > Is this rough list of questions our first pass at what the survey should > contain? > > Have you done any more research on what other communities are doing? > > What are next steps? Well, from my opinion, since the idea is to send

[maintenance] Compressed JSON files and served file extension?

Hi, I have just noticed that: 1123fd8 hydra: build-package-metadata: Compress JSON files. Cool! However, now I get: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ wget https://guix.gnu.org/sources.json $ cat sources.json | jq | head parse error: Invalid numeric literal

Re: Guix-devel Digest, Vol 124, Issue 28

Chris, what would you suggest the best way to increase visibility of revisions or recent patches to "old" issues in Debbugs so they can get covered by Guix QA? On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 9:01 AM wrote: > Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:02:43 +0100 > From: Christopher Baines > To: Andy Tai > Subject: Re:

Re: Need people to help with kernel updates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 02:15:41PM +0200, Wilko Meyer wrote: > seems to be good again at least, as in: > > - it builds locally > - QA[1] looks okayish as far as I can tell (no lint warnings, build > statuses look good on more common ISA) I agree, this already counts as "good". I pushed your pa

Re: Proposal: Differentiate products more clearly (Cycle 01)

Hi Felix, El 12/10/23 a las 1:54, Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. escribió: Hi Felipe, On Thu, Oct 12 2023, Luis Felipe wrote: people call both products by the same name (Guix) I totally agree with you. The confusion is unfortunate. I would call th

Re: Proposal: Differentiate products more clearly (Cycle 01)

Hi Simon, El 12/10/23 a las 8:07, Simon Tournier escribió: Hi, On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 00:15, Luis Felipe wrote: This is a proposal to help differentiate Guix, the package manager, from Guix System. I agree with this proposal. For what it is worth, I remember a discussion past year at 10 Ye

Re: Proposal: Differentiate products more clearly (Cycle 01)

Hi Ricardo, El 12/10/23 a las 12:28, Ricardo Wurmus escribió: Hi, 2018-01-17 · website: say what Guix is at the very top https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-01/msg00232.html Hey, that’s me! Naturally, I do agree that we need clearer product differentiation and your drafts are

Re: [PATCH] web: Include merged_with in graphql .

> Sorry, I missed this patch. I will apply it tonight. Done! https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/mumi.git/commit/?id=a89c5109963de0b5fd1f500ed2e2ede47728fdb4 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/mumi.git/commit/?id=025fc600f1cb4c73042bf920aee3e07d5fb9c53a I have also reconfigured berlin w