Csepp writes:
> Mumi currently fails at its main function of being a search engine for
> issues. I can't even find my own messages with keyword searches,
> because for some reason Mumi connects each words with a logical or and
> doesn't rank search results based on how many hits there are, not
Hello Ricardo,
On 9/3/23 09:36, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Mumi commit bda10fa1b37fed8ea313ea8ad49fa6146e65b4c0 changed the AND to
the Xapian default of OR. Here’s the rationale from the commit message:
xapian: Do not override the default OR implicit query operator.
An implicit AND opera
paul writes:
>> Please go ahead and package the rest of Sourcehut, so we can host it and
>> finally forget about Mumi and Debbugs.
>
> Again, this is not a competition between Sourcehut and Mumi. This is a
> discussion between adults that care very much about the same
> philosophical and politi
> In some scenarios package A may refer to source files in package B.
depending on where and what you need, you can do something like this in a GEXP
context:
(define (upstream-file relative-path)
(let ((git-origin
(let ((commit "v0.13.2"))
(origin
(method git-f
Hi all,
On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 3:35 AM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> I won’t contribute to Mumi any more. Giving it up doesn’t hurt my
> feelings. I’d be glad to see it gone.
For what it's worth, I like Mumi.
One day, I hope to help offer Scheme diffs there. Perhaps it will take
just a pull from
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 01:42:15PM +0200, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> interesting thread: thank you very much to all for the comments and
> tips!
Seconded, this has been a great thread to read through.
> For email based patch workflow one and two things are indispensable: a
> mailbox and a
Hello,
I would like to add a package to guix and send a patch but I'm facing
problems following the chapter "22.1 Building from git"
What I've done so far:
git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
git fetch origin keyring:keyring
guix git authenticate 9edb3f66fd807b096b48283debdcddc
Hi,
> I think this is the biggest hurdle. A lot of folks are using gmail and
> its web based UI and it is just plain awful. I have made the switch to
> using neomutt (and isync + notmuch + mstmp) and it has made emails a joy
> to use and work with.
I use protonmail and they don't provide smtp acc
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> paul writes:
>
>>> Please go ahead and package the rest of Sourcehut, so we can host it and
>>> finally forget about Mumi and Debbugs.
>>
>> Again, this is not a competition between Sourcehut and Mumi. This is a
>> discussion between adults that care very much about th
Csepp writes:
> I'll try to pick up the Sourcehut
> packaging, now that I know there is a chance it would be accepted.
Excellent. Thank you!
I started work on the issue tracker a while ago, but only had enough
time for the first two packages which are in gnu/packages/sourcehut.scm.
--
Rica
On 03-09-2023 19:45, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Hi,
I think this is the biggest hurdle. A lot of folks are using gmail and
its web based UI and it is just plain awful. I have made the switch to
using neomutt (and isync + notmuch + mstmp) and it has made emails a
joy
to use and work with.
I use p
> > This is what I mean when I say many times emacs is kind of mandatory,
> > and
> > this thread is kind of a demonstration of what I meant because the main
> > discussion evolved to: you can use this or that in emacs to ease the
> > dev
> > experience.
>
>
> One of the benefits of my being ab
12 matches
Mail list logo
