Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
[...]
>> I tried https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/65428/patch-set/1 but I get
>> a blank page: any example plz?
> That's a mumi bug IIUC, it works for M > 1. For M = 1, use patch-set
> without /M.
OK, thanks!
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
si
> That said, I understand that some (many?) users are not comfortable with
> CLI interfaces and prefers a GUI interface (web UI is the same), but
> there is no reason to increase the reviewers cognitive overhead by
> introducing an inefficient web based patch management workflow just to
> address a
Am Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:39:17AM + schrieb Attila Lendvai:
> just now i wanted to take a look at mumi's sources, but the link in the
> manual (https://git.elephly.net/gitweb.cgi?p=software/mumi.git) times out.
There is a mumi package in guix, and it gives the source location as
https://g
Hello,
just a tiny comment to one of your points:
Am Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:55:05PM + schrieb Martin Baulig:
> 1. GNU Guix is currently using nfs-utils 2.4.3, whereas 2.6.3 is currently
> the
> latest version. We don't need to upgrade, but I would like to backport
> one
> change,
Am Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:22:01AM +0200 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic:
> Writing the metadata into the commit messages is annoying. It totally should
> be automated, especially since Scheme has pretty simple syntax (so it should
> be easy to write such a thing/famous-last-words). It should just figu
Hello,
Andreas Enge writes:
> Am Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:22:01AM +0200 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic:
>> Writing the metadata into the commit messages is annoying. It totally should
>> be automated, especially since Scheme has pretty simple syntax (so it should
>> be easy to write such a thing/fam
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:38 AM Andreas Enge wrote:
>
> Is there a drawback to updating?
As a heavy user of nfs-utils, I'd be happy to cooperate or assist with
testing any proposed updates. We can add them to my custom channel for
testing. [1]
Kind regards
Felix
[1] https://codeberg.org/le
Summary of my conclusions:
1. We should use sourcehut or continue to improve mumi
- QA status should be visable from a patch's page
- It should be possible to interact with the issue through the page
2. We should create scripts/sub-commands to lift contribution activities
into
higher-
Hello Katherine,
thanks for your summary, which contains many points I would agree with and
actionable items (disclaimer: I do not promise to act on them).
Am Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 10:11:02AM -0600 schrieb Katherine Cox-Buday:
> Here's my understanding of the process to contribute a patch:
My pro
Yep completely agree with all of this.
Personally I dont think its necessery to move to sourcehut but from the
discussions I saw debbugs does seem to become a burden the more time
passes on.
One of the weirdest things for me in guix is how its based on scheme
which is designed to be hacked in pl
10 matches
Mail list logo
