Re: bug#62401: [PATCH] home: Add home-syncthing-service-type.

Hi Bruno, Sergey, and all, is an attempt to provide a consistent and simple way to “port” System services to Home, including Syncthing, as discussed in this thread. Let me know what you think! Ludo’.

Re: The package/inherit trap

Hello, Mark H Weaver writes: > Simon Tournier writes: > >> Hi Tobias, >> >> On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 at 22:11, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> >>> However, merely documenting something is not enough when we have the >>> chance to fix misleading naming, as we do here. It would be nice to >>> have,

Re: The package/inherit trap

Hi, Attila Lendvai writes: >> How about 'package/variant' or 'package/variant-of'? > > +1 for trying to capture the intention in the name, instead of the means of > implementation. I like 'package/variant'. It should be possible to automatically update our code base to use it, and deprecate t

Re: Reusing code for a build-phase?

Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 06.08.23 um 14:49 schrieb Csepp: >> Maybe you could create a build system that inherits from the one these >> packages use, but adds the extra phase. > > I was thinking about this, too. But this seems to be too much, as > there are not hundreds of Vagrant plugins. Al