Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently packaging vagrant and some plugins. For all plugins an
> additional phase is required, generating a json file, see below. Since this
> is quite
> some code, I'd like to put it into some definition or some wrapper. Since it
> uses (this-package-v
Am 06.08.23 um 14:49 schrieb Csepp:
Maybe you could create a build system that inherits from the one these
packages use, but adds the extra phase.
I was thinking about this, too. But this seems to be too much, as there
are not hundreds of Vagrant plugins. Also a build-system requires
document
Hi Hartmut,
On 2023-08-05 09:25, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently packaging vagrant and some plugins. For all plugins an
> additional phase is required, generating a json file, see below. Since this
> is quite some code, I'd like to put it into some definition or some wrapper.
> S
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 at 22:11, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>
>> However, merely documenting something is not enough when we have the
>> chance to fix misleading naming, as we do here. It would be nice to
>> have, but orthogonal.
>
> I would not say it is
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> But I'll gladly judge other bikesheds if they lead to a less misleading name.
How about 'package/variant' or 'package/variant-of'?
-- (
> How about 'package/variant' or 'package/variant-of'?
+1 for trying to capture the intention in the name, instead of the means of
implementation.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“Although teachers do care and do work very, very hard, the institution is
psychopathic-it h
