On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 06:30:26AM +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 18.06.2023 um 21:07 +0200 schrieb Denis 'GNUtoo'
> Carikli:
> > [...]
> > > Didn't you say that a hello world for scummvm exists?
> > I don't know. There is a template for AGI games but the license is
> > stran
Hi,
Do you plan on including coq.scm in the upgrade plan, as it also depends
on dune? If so, would coq-packages also be upgraded, or should that be
done after the ocaml-team branch has been merged with master?
Anyway, I am new to Guix, but will try to help if I can (time- and
competence-wise)
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 02:55:21PM -0400, kiasoc5 wrote:
> On 6/19/23 08:54, Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
> System distribution. wrote:
> >
> > One of the criticism that can be read online about Guix (compared to
> > Nix) is its speed. I have never tried Nix and probably
Hi everyone,
DABY-SEESARAM Arnaud writes:
> Do you plan on including coq.scm in the upgrade plan, as it also depends
> on dune? If so, would coq-packages also be upgraded, or should that be
> done after the ocaml-team branch has been merged with master?
>
> Anyway, I am new to Guix, but will t
On 2023-06-20 12:45, W. T. Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
> writes:
>
>> One of the criticism that can be read online about Guix (compared to
>> Nix) is its speed.
>
> I am using guix as well as nix, and depending on the opera
Hello,
please consider I am (was?) a /great/ fan of rebase, but I have to admit
that "the golden rule" [1] of rebasing makes sense: «never rebase on a
public branch.»
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:47:54PM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> I'm not sure how that'd work, since G
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> As discussed previously in this thread, a good policy would be to
> suggest avoid *both* rebases and merges during a feature branch
> development. This way we avoid both problems,
I read the whole thread and AFAIU the (only?) problem with the "merging
master
Hi,
Is there a trick to fetching Git submodules with (recursive? #t)? It
does not seem to work with the package definition below.
The code uses Ekaitz's proposed Zig build system. [1] Thank you!
Kind regards
Felix
[1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/60889
* * *
gnu: Add river.
* gnu/packages/zig.
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
writes:
> Is there a trick to fetching Git submodules with (recursive? #t)? It
> does not seem to work with the package definition below.
>
> The code uses Ekaitz's proposed Zig build system. [1] Thank you!
Not sure whe
Hi unmatched-paren!
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:52 AM ( wrote:
>
> (If you've already tried building it without the RECURSIVE?, then this
> issue will go unnoticed, as the derivation paths [...]
> are *exactly the same*
Okay, that nipped me in the hiney. Now it works!
Thanks for explaining! You
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:33 PM, Felix Lechner via \"Development of GNU Guix
and the GNU System distribution.\" wrote:
> Hi unmatched-paren!
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:52 AM ( wrote:
>>
>> (If you've already tried building it without the RECURSIVE?, then this
>> issue will go unnoticed, as
John Kehayias writes:
> This happens enough I feel like it should be explicitly mentioned as a
> potential
> "gotcha" in the manual, even if one can gleam it from understanding package
> definitions and hashes, if it isn't already. Or maybe a little "tips" section
> on
> packaging (or in the coo
Hi Giovanni,
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>
>> As discussed previously in this thread, a good policy would be to
>> suggest avoid *both* rebases and merges during a feature branch
>> development. This way we avoid both problems,
>
> I read the whole thread
I have a question / suggestion about the distributed substitutes
project: would downloads be split into uniformly sized chunks or could
the sizes vary?
Specifically, in an extreme case where an update introduced a single
extra byte at the beginning of a file, would that result in completely
new chu
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:30:26 +0200
Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Note, that this discussion started IIRC a year ago and we have
> practically known about actually existing FSDG violations since then.
> My approach here is quite simple and pragmatic: Remove the games which
> obviously violate the
15 matches
Mail list logo
