[PATCH] web: Include blocked-by in graphql .

* mumi/web/graphql.scm (): Include blocked-by. --- mumi/web/graphql.scm | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mumi/web/graphql.scm b/mumi/web/graphql.scm index aa4f38c..3cc19cd 100644 --- a/mumi/web/graphql.scm +++ b/mumi/web/graphql.scm @@ -63,7 +63,10 @@

Re: [PATCH] web: Include blocked-by in graphql .

Christopher Baines writes: > * mumi/web/graphql.scm (): Include blocked-by. > --- > mumi/web/graphql.scm | 5 - > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mumi/web/graphql.scm b/mumi/web/graphql.scm > index aa4f38c..3cc19cd 100644 > --- a/mumi/web/graphql.scm > +++ b/

Re: [PATCH] web: Include blocked-by in graphql .

Hi Chris, Thanks for the patch! I have pushed it after renaming blocked-by to blocked_by. Underscores are a bit cringey, but unfortunately GraphQL doesn't like hyphens. To see the effects of this change, we need to reconfigure berlin to run the latest mumi. I will figure that out and do it soon

Re: Guidelines for pre-trained ML model weight binaries (Was re: Where should we put machine learning model parameters?)

Hi Ludo, On ven., 26 mai 2023 at 17:37, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Well, I do not know if we have reached a conclusion. From my point of >> view, both can be included *if* their licenses are compatible with Free >> Software – included the weights (pre-trained model) as licensed data. > > We disc

Re: How many bytes do we add (closure of guix) when adding one new package?

Hi, On ven., 26 mai 2023 at 18:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I agree that .go files are quite big (.scm files as well, but we’ve > improved information density somewhat by removing input labels :-)). > > The size of .go files went down when we switch to the baseline compiler > (aka. -O1): > > h

pam_ssh_agent_auth on a Guix System?

Hello, AFAIU pam_ssh_agent_auth https://pamsshagentauth.sourceforge.net/ is not already packaged in Guix, or am I missing something? I'd like to execute sudo without having to set and enter a password [1] and that PAM module is needed ...then also a service to properly setup /etc/pam.d/sudo and

Re: pam_ssh_agent_auth on a Guix System?

Hi Giovanni, On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:59 AM Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > > AFAIU pam_ssh_agent_auth https://pamsshagentauth.sourceforge.net/ is not > already packaged in Guix, or am I missing something? I was not able to find it, either. > I'd like to execute sudo without having to set and enter

Re: [PATCH] web: Include blocked-by in graphql .

Arun Isaac writes: > Thanks for the patch! I have pushed it after renaming blocked-by to > blocked_by. Underscores are a bit cringey, but unfortunately GraphQL > doesn't like hyphens. > > To see the effects of this change, we need to reconfigure berlin to run > the latest mumi. I will figure tha

ping on a build fix for a build failure (main branch)

Hi, following previous comments (thanks) I have submitted a patch to correctly fix a build failure due to compiler warnings, instead of avoiding not building tests, on this Guix bug issue: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=63526 Please review the patch (which shall be a simple and low

Re: branch master updated: gnu: eudev: Use new package style.

Am Montag, dem 29.05.2023 um 20:29 +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines: > > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > > > Am Montag, dem 29.05.2023 um 19:28 +0100 schrieb Christopher > > Baines: > > > > > > guix-comm...@gnu.org writes: > > > > > > > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receiv

Re: How many bytes do we add (closure of guix) when adding one new package?

Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > On ven., 26 mai 2023 at 18:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> I agree that .go files are quite big (.scm files as well, but we’ve >> improved information density somewhat by removing input labels :-)). >> >> The size of .go files went down when we switch to the ba

Re: branch master updated: gnu: eudev: Use new package style.

> > As for reverting it, I'm somewhat indifferent. I'm more interested in > > the longer term cost of making changes like this than the temporary > > drops in substitute availability. > > You mean as a precedent for similar commits in the future or as a way > of involuntarily breaking other packag

Re: How many bytes do we add (closure of guix) when adding one new package?

On Tue, 30 May 2023, Simon Tournier wrote: Just to put a figure on what means “big”: currently the .go files are 5 times bigger than their associated .scm. Somehow, it’s the trap of DSL. :-) Packages are declarative and the information they declare is not dense. However, because they are bytec

Workflow ideas [Was: branch master updated: gnu: eudev: Use new package style.]

Hi Attila, On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:49 PM Attila Lendvai wrote: > > maybe with the addition of team branches a core-updates branch would be much > more manageable? and it'd be easier to merge it more frequently? I think even fewer people will feel responsible for that unloved branch. Instead,

Re: branch master updated: gnu: eudev: Use new package style.

Hi, > a less frequent drop in substitute availability on master would considerably > elevate my satisfaction with guix as a user. and in my reading that is the > cost that Christopher talks about here. I was also unhappy enough to pull after the change was made, but substitutes were not availab