[gnome-team] gtk+ on core-updates

Hello Maxim, your gtk+ update on core-updates broke gnome packages since it somehow moved the bin/ subdirectory from the bin to the out output, so that gtk-update-icon-cache is not found any more by packages using gtk+:bin as input. Should the split not happen automagically? Maybe this is a defic

Re: gstreamer 2.22, webkitgtk 2.40.0, qt 5.15.8 and ffmpeg 6 on staging

Am Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 05:24:41PM -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > Reviewing the list of newly broken things, there was a flaky test spot > in python-pyopenssl (IIRC!) that led me to attempt to upgrade > python-cryptography, which is a bit more involved than I'd like. Okay, so I cherry-picked you

Re: Fix for librsvg 2.40 on core-updates

Hello, Am Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 04:53:15PM + schrieb Kaelyn: > On core-updates, librsvg-2.40 fails to compile due to a single failing test > (I've confirmed the failure on x86_64 and i686, though the package is only > used/needed on non-x86_64 systems for gtk+ and others; it also affects wine

Re: Guidelines for pre-trained ML model weight binaries (Was re: Where should we put machine learning model parameters?)

>From my point of view, the tackle of such biased weights is not via re-learning because how to draw the line between biased weights, mistakes on their side, mistakes on our side, etc. and it requires a high level of expertise to complete a full re-learning. This strikes me as similar to being in t

Re: gstreamer 2.22, webkitgtk 2.40.0, qt 5.15.8 and ffmpeg 6 on staging

Hi Andreas, Andreas Enge writes: > Am Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 05:24:41PM -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: >> Reviewing the list of newly broken things, there was a flaky test spot >> in python-pyopenssl (IIRC!) that led me to attempt to upgrade >> python-cryptography, which is a bit more involved tha

Re: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

Hi Andreas and everyone, Andreas Enge writes: > Ludovic and Chris have corrected a problem in dune.scm in commit >01d9859821c5df6cc76c59e48fddd3c8cfa88ff0 > Now all of core-updates is being built, and the dashboard is back. > Thanks a lot! > > This means that people can now work on repairing

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

> Yes, it is the task of P2P storage system. Is Guix one P2P storage > solution? Or should Guix exploit already implemented P2P storage > systems? i automatically assumed the latter, because p2p storage is a non-trivial task that multiple teams are working to solve, and it's yet to be seen which

Re: Fix for librsvg 2.40 on core-updates

--- Original Message --- On Saturday, April 8th, 2023 at 9:52 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: > > > Hello, > > Am Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 04:53:15PM + schrieb Kaelyn: > > > On core-updates, librsvg-2.40 fails to compile due to a single failing test > > (I've confirmed the failure on x86_64

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

> Haven't read the Swarm thing, going more off of the general vibe of > these cryptocurrency related projects that keep popping up: > Using some kind of (optional) web of trust for clients makes more sense > to me than making people pay with cryptocurrencies. > > I should be able to set up two com

Re: GOOPS-less Shepherd

I don't have strong feelings either way, and the change won't really affect me too much, but what benefit is there in breaking things? From what I understand from your message, users' configs will stop working in a few months when 1.0.x releases (or with the macro would "kinda work"), which is at

[core-updates] qtbase 6 ssl tests fail.

Hi Guix, on core-updates qtbase 6.3 fails its test suite. The tst_QSslKey group of tests has 122 failures that all look like this: FAIL! : tst_QSslKey::passphraseChecks(DES) '!key.isNull()' returned FALSE. () Loc: [/tmp/guix-build-qtbase-6.3.2.drv-0/qtbase-everywhere-src-6.3.2/tests/auto/ne

Re: 09/09: lint: Append "/info/refs" to git-reference-url.

Hi Sergey, Sergey Trofimov writes: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> Hello, >> >> guix-comm...@gnu.org writes: >> >>> lint: Append "/info/refs" to git-reference-url. >>> >> After this fix, I'm now seeing warnings from Github, e.g.: >> >> gnu/packages/rails.scm:675:2: ruby-activejob@7.0.4.3: sc

Re: [RFC] Cosmetic changes to define-configuration usage

Hi Bruno, Bruno Victal writes: > On 2023-03-31 15:46, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:> I have some apprehension > that if we start adding white space between the >> fields here, we'll soon have people adding white space to many other >> places (for consistency or other reasons), which I wouldn't welcome

Re: [gnome-team] gtk+ on core-updates

Hi Andreas, Andreas Enge writes: > Hello Maxim, > > your gtk+ update on core-updates broke gnome packages since it somehow > moved the bin/ subdirectory from the bin to the out output, so that > gtk-update-icon-cache is not found any more by packages using gtk+:bin > as input. > > Should the spl

Help wanted: search paths for Erlang and Elixir

Hello, Guixers! Erlang/OTP has notion of applications [1], they are usually installed in $PREFIX/lib/erlang/lib in the form of directories named APP-VERSION, e.g. asn1-5.0.19. In order for the Erlang runtime to find the installed application it must appear in the load path. If there is ERL_ROOTD

Re: GOOPS-less Shepherd

Bodertz writes: > I don't have strong feelings either way, and the change won't really > affect me too much, but what benefit is there in breaking things? From > what I understand from your message, users' configs will stop working in > a few months when 1.0.x releases (or with the macro would "

Re: GOOPS-less Shepherd

Thanks, makes sense.