On 2023-03-12 08:46, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 12.03.2023 um 09:18 +0400 schrieb Andrew Tropin:
>> > As for tree-sitter-with/without-gtk, I have no opinion here. We
>> > could try exporting package rewriters so that everyone can have
>> > their cup of tea, but maintaining one
On 12-03-2023 08:46, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
Am Sonntag, dem 12.03.2023 um 09:18 +0400 schrieb Andrew Tropin:
> As for tree-sitter-with/without-gtk, I have no opinion here. We
> could try exporting package rewriters so that everyone can have
> their cup of tea, but maintaining one's own Em
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 21:33, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> It may help to shed a bit of light on the original reason I think this
> change came into existence, and in the interest of transparency and
> hopefully improving or finding alternatives to the proposed change, I
> consent to Ludovic ope
Hello Chris,
Am Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 06:24:38PM + schrieb Christopher Baines:
> I configured QA to submit builds for core-updates a little while back,
> currently it requires a code change [1].
> 1:
> https://git.cbaines.net/guix/qa-frontpage/commit/?id=39e9ec627faca95a7b43ff91e195ca9ab9846bf
Hello,
Am Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:56:27PM +0100 schrieb Josselin Poiret:
> I've been looking at the state of most failures for the CI jobset for
> core-updates, and we have a couple of problems:
> - gcc < 9 and gcc == 12 never cross-compile.
> - we can't build the cross toolchain for the hurd, bec
Hello,
Am Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 10:26:18PM -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
> > I hope the maintainer team can help make teams “more functional”,
> > whatever that teams. It’s really what maintainership is about in Guix;
> > it’s not about writing code.
> I'm happy to help
Hi Maxim,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 22:26, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> I'm sorry that you feel that way. I don't think consensus was willfully
> broken, and perhaps by studying some actual examples of these
> occurrences we can better understand what went wrong and how the new
> suggested policy woul
Am Sonntag, dem 12.03.2023 um 10:46 +0100 schrieb indieterminacy:
> Out of curiosity, where do such prescriptions concerning one tool or
> a set of tools get documented?
It isn't, but note the manual on version numbers leads with
> We usually package only the latest version of a given free software
Hi Andreas,
> But I confirm that ghc@9.2.5 now fails its tests, it has happened a second
> time for me. Nothing in the recent commits to core-updates since I tried
> the last time springs to mind as obviously having a connection to these
> failures.
fixed by commit ec79901a33b6463ad77dcaf4c37e538
Am Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 05:26:51PM +0100 schrieb Lars-Dominik Braun:
> > But I confirm that ghc@9.2.5 now fails its tests
> fixed by commit ec79901a33b6463ad77dcaf4c37e538645b4d7b5 on
> core-updates. I also verified pandoc builds.
Wow, fantastic, thanks a lot!
Andreas
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello,
>
> Am Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 10:26:18PM -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> > I hope the maintainer team can help make teams “more functional”,
>> > whatever that teams. It’s really what maintainership is about in Guix;
>> > it’
Hi,
With core-updates possibly being replaced by feature branches, I am
not sure where to place this update to GNU Inetutils 2.4.
The patch series [1] will rebuild 3,416 packages.
Thank you, everyone, for your hard work!
Kind regards,
Felix Lechner
[1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/62154
12 matches
Mail list logo
