Andreas Enge writes:
Hello,
> Am Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:34:56PM +0100 schrieb Janneke Nieuwenhuizen:
>> To use stat64 and friends on 32bit, I created the attached patch for GNU
>> Mes and hope to create a 0.24.2 release from
>> https://gitlab.com/janneke/mes/-/tree/wip-stat64
>
> Thanks a lo
Hi,
just a heads-up: The long overdue Haskell update is finally rolling in,
bumping our packages to Stackage release 20.5 and the compiler to 9.2. The
corresponding issue is #61420.
Is there anything preventing a merge into currently? Can we coordinate
the merge with some other big world-rebuildi
Hello Lars,
Am Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:01:16AM +0100 schrieb Lars-Dominik Braun:
> just a heads-up: The long overdue Haskell update is finally rolling in,
> bumping our packages to Stackage release 20.5 and the compiler to 9.2. The
> corresponding issue is #61420.
congratulations!
> Is there any
Am Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:10:27PM +0200 schrieb Efraim Flashner:
> > I got to hello on my aarch64, which is very encouraging! I will have to
> > try again with your latest changes to core-updates, but am rather
> > optimistic.
>
> Also I made a typo in the tar fix, so I'll push a fix for that af
Am Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 05:40:36PM +0100 schrieb Julien Lepiller:
> Could we get berlin to evaluate a small set of core packages (mpc, hello, …)?
> Are the changes intended to fix the issue with bordeaux's machines? Is it
> configured to build core-updates?
The MES changes were meant to fix bug
Hi Andreas,
> I do not think we should coordinate, this was part of the motivation for
> considering feature branches in the first place, to avoid entanglement
> with different updates.
ah, alright. I’ll give everyone more time for reviews and then just
merge it.
> However, QA has not run yet:
>
Am Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:45:47AM +0100 schrieb Lars-Dominik Braun:
> There’s a job on CI already: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/wip-haskell
Okay, then it should be fine to merge; since both build farms are enabled
by default, if there are substitutes at one of them, this is enough.
Thanks!
An
James Thomas writes:
> Makes sense to me, because the guix package definition was only updated
> with the new release (see 'guix edit guix'). Maybe you can try:
Indeed. That's at least an explanation, though I still don't see *why*
it is done this way. In fact, the role of the package "guix" isn
Hi Lars,
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 10:01, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote:
> Is there anything preventing a merge into currently? Can we coordinate
> the merge with some other big world-rebuilding changes waiting to happen
> (apart from core-updates)?
As discussed in #61420 [1], from my small experiments
Hello everyone,
Sorry for the late reply, but as I've been asked by Simon to provide a public
answer I managed to retrieve this message to reply that I do agree with the new
licensing of CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL 1.3 for my contribution to the "10 years of
stories" : )
Have a nice day folks,
Alice
On Mon, 2022-11-28 at 18:22 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
>
> Ludo’.
>
> ¹ https://list
Guix,
Installing guix from source fails on the build of openssl@1.1.1l. I
see the same error on my working system (log attached) when executing
the command below. The issue looks to be caused by OpenSSL's expired
test certs fixed in 1.1.1p [0]. Guix currently grafts openssl 1.1.1s
but it seems gra
On 2/14/23 1:08 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
Also I don't think there's a lot of overlap between go and rust so we
can probably have both going at the same time.
Oh, yes, I didn't mean to imply that the two were related, or
conflicted. I just wanted to point it out in case it was of any help.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:15:21PM -0500, Greg Hogan wrote:
> Installing guix from source fails on the build of openssl@1.1.1l. I
> see the same error on my working system (log attached) when executing
> the command below. The issue looks to be caused by OpenSSL's expired
> test certs fixed in 1.1.
Am Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:27:10PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> Am Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:31:15PM +0200 schrieb Efraim Flashner:
> > Looks like you might be able to drop openjdk-10-hotspot-stack-size.patch
> > from openjdk-19.0.1.
> Maybe. What is strange is that we have the same openjdk package
Am Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:51:56PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> Actually the patch has already been applied to openjdk13, if I am not
> mistaken. So I do not understand how the source could be built in master
> then, while the exact same code (?!) fails on core-updates...
Well, there is a somewha
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 1:33 PM Leo Famulari wrote:
>
> It only really affects distros like Guix or Nix, so it's our problem to
> fix.
I forgot to mention that I also needed to switch the pull url from
https to http, otherwise git would fail on certificate verification. I
believe this is secure w
I noticed this recommendation of a Nix tool.
Its not my specialism and Im only providing it for stimulation or as a
conversation starter.
```
All the necessary components (coreboot, kernel, busybox-based initramfs
with cryptsetup/lvm2) are stored entirely in the bootloader flash chip.
This le
18 matches
Mail list logo
