Hi,
On Thu, 09 Feb 2023 at 18:07, "jgart" wrote:
> Just opening this thread for us to brainstorm how we can improve the
> symbiosis between guix build -S and --with-branch.
Well, indeed this bug could be fixed,
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix build eles
Hi,
On Fri, 02 Dec 2022 at 17:06, zimoun wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 18:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the â10 years of
>> storiesâ post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush,
>> though the sooner the more likely we are
guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>
> abcdw pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
> new c77a3d4554 gnu: emacs: Add TREE_SITTER_GRAMMAR_PA
Hello everyone,
Yes, I agree for my
contribution to the blog posts with the license under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
GFDL version 1.3 or later
Thank you,
Manolis
I thought I agreed when I sent my part, but in case I haven't:
I agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL
version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts,
and no Back-Cover Texts.
Hi,
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the â10 years of
> storiesâ post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
Iâm also fine with the terms proposed here.
Lars
On 2023-02-11 11:29, Christopher Baines wrote:
> guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
>
>> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>>
>> abcdw pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
>>
> Do you agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL
> version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and
> no Back-Cover Texts?
Yes, I agree.
publickey - luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com - 0x12DE1598.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.a
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:22:15 +0100
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their
> work under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no
> Invariant Sections
Dear lawyers of the world,
I agree for my contribution to the blog post
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/
to be published under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later (or
whatever other open license the maintainers of the blog might prefer in
the future).
Dear lawyers of the world,
I agree for my contribution to the blog post
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/
to be published under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later (or
whatever other open license the maintainers of the blog might prefer in
the future)
On 2023-02-11 16:35, Andrew Tropin wrote:
> On 2023-02-11 11:29, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
>> guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
>>
>>> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>>>
>>> abcdw pushed a commit to branch master
>>> in repository guix.
>>>
>>> The following commit
Am Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 01:43:56PM +0200 schrieb Manolis Ragkousis:
> Yes, I agree for my
> contribution to the blog posts with the license under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL version 1.3 or later
I also agree, in case I have not yet.
Andreas
Hello Guix developers,
Does guix deploy support cross compilation targets (as opposed to qemu
emulation with binfmt_misc)?
If not, would you consider adding support for that? With some guidance on
where to find the appropriate locations to modify in the codebase, I could
try to help out.
Here is
Hello Guilers!
Following a discussion started at the Guix Days and continued onlineš,
it seems we could benefit from a compiler warning for unused modules,
and this is what this patch does.
The new â-Wunused-moduleâ warning is enabled at â-W2â only. The main
reason for not enabling it at â-W1â i
* module/language/tree-il/fix-letrec.scm (fix-letrec): Remove "Local
Variables" bit.
* .dir-locals.el (scheme-mode): Add 'record-case'.
---
.dir-locals.el | 1 +
module/language/tree-il/fix-letrec.scm | 4
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.
* module/language/tree-il/analyze.scm (): New record type.
(unused-module-analysis): New variable.
(make-unused-module-analysis): New analysis.
(make-analyzer): Add it.
* module/system/base/message.scm (%warning-types): Add 'unused-module'.
* test-suite/tests/tree-il.test (%opts-w-unused-module): N
These were found with:
make GUILE_WARNINGS='-W1 -Wunused-module'
* module/ice-9/copy-tree.scm:
* module/ice-9/eval-string.scm:
* module/ice-9/getopt-long.scm:
* module/ice-9/poll.scm:
* module/ice-9/popen.scm:
* module/ice-9/sandbox.scm:
* module/ice-9/threads.scm:
* module/sxml/apply-templates
For these interested, this issue/patch adds emacs using motif to Guix
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/61421
Please review... etc.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 7:01 PM Eric Brown wrote:
> My interest in this package is because
> openmotif is the best of the X window managers that do not suffer from
> a ra
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> half a year ago I submitted this bug report:
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57501
>
> âcall-with-file-lockâ and âcall-with-file-lock/no-waitâ create a lock
> file but donât remove the lock file when they exit. The lock on
> the file is lifted, but the lock f
Hi GĂĄbor!
GĂĄbor Boskovits skribis:
> I will contact Jose, pass a link to the ideas side and check how to proceed
> and if we can help somehow.
Awesome, thank you. (And thanks everyone for working on the wiki page!)
Ludoâ.
Hi Nicolas!
Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." skribis:
> I found an working solution to avoid waiting for the `Computing Guix
> derivation' part when pulling or else.
>
> Here's my snippet:
>
> ```
> (use-modules
> (git)
> (guix profiles)
> (srfi sr
Hi,
Andrew Tropin skribis:
> On 2023-02-11 16:35, Andrew Tropin wrote:
[...]
>>> The change to guix-emacs.el is pretty impactful here since that affects
>>> all the emacs packages including emacs-minimal I think.
>>>
>>> If I've understood your comment correctly, that does seem pretty
>>> wast
On 2023-02-12 01:14, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Tropin skribis:
>
>> On 2023-02-11 16:35, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>
> [...]
>
The change to guix-emacs.el is pretty impactful here since that affects
all the emacs packages including emacs-minimal I think.
If I've under
24 matches
Mail list logo
