>> Say for example emacs-org-roam@2.2.2: it requires emacs-org 9.4,
>> which is not specified in the package definition, meaning we always
>> pull the latest available. Do we have to, provided that emacs
>> releases with org? Maybe there is already a clear rule about this
>> topic, but to me thi
Friends of Guix,
Anyone interested in having dinner tonight in Brussels?
Leo
Hi,
On +2023-01-11 16:34:41 +0100, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 at 12:16, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Simon Tournier skribis:
> >
> >> Maybe my question is naive but what is the use case for this (sha256 #f)
> >> in the first place? Because maybe it could just error using
Am Sonntag, dem 05.02.2023 um 11:50 +0100 schrieb Cayetano Santos:
>
>
> > > Say for example emacs-org-roam@2.2.2: it requires emacs-org 9.4,
> > > which is not specified in the package definition, meaning we
> > > always pull the latest available. Do we have to, provided that
> > > emacs release
