Re: CLI flag to ignore guix channel

Hi, On sam., 28 janv. 2023 at 20:55, Csepp wrote: >>> guix import crate behemoth-rust-package-foo -r --ignore-channel=guixrus [...] >> guix time-machine -C path/to/channels-wo-guixrus.scm \ >> -- import crate behemoth-rust-package-foo -r > How fast is that? If new commits come i

Re: guix package updates review: app team?

Hi, On ven., 27 janv. 2023 at 14:19, Andy Tai wrote: > Hi, currently Guix has teams of reviewers for different types of > packages. For example, changes to R packages and emacs seem to be > reviewed quickly. However, recently, patches for updating more > general application packages (octave,

Request for review of: [bug#60899] [PATCH 00/25] gnu: golang: Add gopls

Katherine Cox-Buday writes: > This is a patch series to add the gopls package. > > I haven't contributed to many projects which use the e-mail flow, so > hopefully I'm doing this correctly. Please feel free to make > suggestions if not! > > Some of the diffs are a little busier than I'd like for

Re: purpose of GnuTLS versions

On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Simon Tournier wrote: Hi, On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 00:12, Jack Hill wrote: It seems to me that the `gnutls` variable should refer to the latest "stable" release, and the `gnutls-latest` variable to latest "next" release. Does that make sense? What am I missing? This mean

Re: purpose of GnuTLS versions

On Mon, 30 Jan 2023, Jack Hill wrote: To help us decide, I've asked [0] the GnuTLS developers for their thoughts. I was directed to an older thread [0] which provides some more insight. Having read that, I propose to moving to just one gnutls version in core-updates. Thoughts? Then there's

Re: Proposed changes to the commit policy

Hi! My 2¢ on this… As a committer & reviewer, I love that I can just go to , pick one of the patch series with a green tick, and have the assurance that the resource-intensive work is already done. That makes a big difference! As someone who submits patches, I r

Re: valgrind

Hi! The two ‘/interactive’ versions can probably be merged; I don’t think there was a good reason to keep 3.17. Thanks, Ludo’.

Re: purpose of GnuTLS versions

Hi Jack, Jack Hill skribis: > We currently have two versions of GnuTLS packaged: 3.7.2 represented > by the `gnutls` variable and 3.7.7 represented by the `gnutls-latest` > variable. `guix refresh -l` reports that changes to the 3.7.2 version > would cause 14770 rebuilds, but only 30 rebuilds fo

Re: 01/02: packages: Adjust 'generate-package-cache' for Guile 3.0.9.

Hi! Simon Tournier skribis: > Commit ba1b61a72d56600e7c6f9c490129e95ab9ba0c9e reads: > > packages: Adjust 'generate-package-cache' for Guile 3.0.9. > > * gnu/packages.scm (generate-package-cache): Adjust for Guile 3.0.9. [...] > What are the performances about this change? Does it improve the

Re: Translation files .gmo and packaging

Hello! Simon Tournier skribis: > What is the usual way to deal with these generated files? Can we > distribute them although it is not the Guix project that generates them > from source? In pure bootstrappable spirit, we should view tarballs as byproducts, not source, and thus depend only on t

Re: UTF-8 progress bar

👋 Julien Lepiller skribis: > I have a patch waiting (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59975) that will > change progress bars to use some unicode characters. I think they look > better, but I'm a bit afraid they might not look right on some config, > so I'd like to know if your terminal is able to sh

Re: Proposed changes to the commit policy (#59513)

Andreas Enge writes: > Am Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:45:20AM + schrieb Christopher Baines: >> > as a quick concrete question: Do simple package updates still count as >> > trivial, or do they need to go through the patches mailing list? >> My feeling on this is that "simple" package updates are

Re: UTF-8 progress bar

Hi Ludo, Akib, et al, On +2023-01-30 23:02:43 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > 👋 ^^--- interesting: I see that thumb up emoji in mutt's display, but not in emacs, which I have configured mutt to use as my editor. > > Julien Lepiller skribis: > > > I have a patch waiting (https://issues.guix

Re: UTF-8 progress bar

Hi, On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 3:35 PM wrote: > > I suspect those characters could be made to work in Akib's console > if his kernel supports KMS and setfont etc .. The characters displayed correctly in my Linux virtual console VT2 after I ran this command in Bash: setfont /gnu/store/iga6jf0k

Re: FOSDEM: Meeting on Wednesday evening?

Ludovic Courtès writes: Hello! > I’ll be in Brussels on Wednesday afternoon, Feb. 1st. As was tradition > in the good’ol times, I propose that interested parties meet in the bar > called “Au Bon Vieux Temps”, downtown, let’s say around 6:30PM: > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.8483