Am 24.12.22 um 04:49 schrieb jgart:
Should GNU Guix be a small core of packages (and services?)?
No. As others already stated, this would complicate things for users.
Having all available software at on place is a big plus. (For many
GNU/Linux distros you need to add another ppa for many „sta
On 2022-12-26, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian writes:
>> On 2022-12-22, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>> Vagrant Cascadian writes:
>> I will take a guess that it was commit
>> c2c1dfdf5760873f1db86d14873f725a105f7feb which removed the "name" bit:
>
> Oh, that explains it, thank you for digg
Is there a good reason to have put %gnu-build-system-modules after other
modules when defining %X-build-system-modules ?
I met a packaging error two times when hacking guile or maven packages,
where after using the #:modules flag in arguments, I found myself with
gnu build-system packaging phase
Hi Guixers,
Should Guix support writing CLI Common Lisp scripts? (Think Roswell)
> Although Roswell is a unified interface to Common Lisp implementations, it
> also encourages writing scripts with it.
> A "Roswell script" is an implementation-independent script which can be
> invoked from a she
Hi Guixers/Lispers,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 06:14 PM, jgart wrote:
> Hi Guixers,
>
> Should Guix support writing CLI Common Lisp scripts? (Think Roswell)
>
>> Although Roswell is a unified interface to Common Lisp implementations, it
>> also
>> encourages writing scripts with it.
>> A "Roswell s
Right you are, I am quite new to mailing lists and I thought emacs would “do
the right thing”.
- Mitchell
> On Dec 27, 2022, at 4:15 AM, Mekeor Melire wrote:
>
> 2022-12-26 14:20 mitchellschmeis...@librem.one:
>
>> Perhaps you are thinking about this upside down?
>>
>> emacs has support fo
> I'm not sure what you mean if it is something beyond what we can do already
> with 'guix shell.' Do
> you mean using a particular hashbang as well?
Yes, that is one feature that I was nodding ambiguously at. Sorry
> guix shell sbcl sbcl-cl-csv unoconv -- sbcl --load myscript.lisp
> ~/Downloa
> What about something like this?
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> #!/bin/sh
> #|-*- mode:lisp -*-|#
> #|
> exec guix shell sbcl -- sbcl --script $0 "$@"
> |#
>
> (format t "test~%")
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>
> Th
Hi Jgart,
On +2022-12-27 19:23:18 +, jgart wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean if it is something beyond what we can do already
> > with 'guix shell.' Do
> > you mean using a particular hashbang as well?
>
> Yes, that is one feature that I was nodding ambiguously at. Sorry
>
> > guix she
Mekeor Melire writes:
>> Perhaps you are thinking about this upside down?
>>
>> emacs has support for guix via `emacs-guix`.
>> Would it not make more sense to make a drop in replacement for
>> `use-package` which is syntactically identical but instead of
>> downloading stuff from the emacs packa
10 matches
Mail list logo
