Am Sonntag, dem 18.09.2022 um 20:13 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath:
> On the other hand, even Nix puts '/bin/sh' at its usual path: we are
> really quite an outlier in this respect. (IIUC, Nix also has
> '/usr/bin/env', but no other utilities at FHS paths.)
We are not. We provide both /bin/sh and /u
Hi,
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 at 09:51, jgart wrote:
> Why does Guix implement a monad but not a functor and an applicative?
>From my understanding, because an appropriate and straightforward
abstraction for the store is the State Monad.
Maybe the implementator of the monadic stuff in Guix read righ
Christopher Baines writes:
> Since it's easier to iterate once there's something visible, I've just
> stuck what I've got so far on the internet, it's available at:
>
> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/
>
> The code is here [3] and I've put a list of ideas in the README.
>
> 3: https://git.cbaines.net/
Hi Aret,
> If you don't want to use Guix, you may have a look at the live bootstrap
> project
>
>https://github.com/fosslinux/live-bootstrap
You might want to take a look at the following files:
https://github.com/fosslinux/live-bootstrap/blob/master/sysa/run.kaem
https://github.com/fosslin
Hello Luis/sirgazil. Translation help sounds great.
That said, I believe that, because others will add to the translation,
that it would be best if you Downloaded the Spain Spanish file from
Weblate and then uploaded that PO file as the first translation in
Colombian Spanish. Then change it from
On 19-09-2022 02:13, Philip McGrath wrote:
1) If we want to continue to hard-code a specific shell into Glibc,
We do, for reproducibility -- otherwise, the behaviour of the 'system'
function depends on whatever is the current /bin/sh, and sometimes
/bin/sh is updated (and on some foreign sy
Hi everyone,
Maxime Devos writes:
> Fallbacks might be necessary (not every store item is constructed from a
> package), but it all sounds doable and efficient. Also the union could
> needs to be modified to ignore the .graft-offsets of the union'ed things.
If I understand the whole thing pro
On 19-09-2022 18:26, Josselin Poiret wrote:
Hi everyone,
Maxime Devos writes:
Fallbacks might be necessary (not every store item is constructed from a
package), but it all sounds doable and efficient. Also the union could
needs to be modified to ignore the .graft-offsets of the union'ed thing
Am Montag, dem 19.09.2022 um 13:53 +0200 schrieb pelzflorian (Florian
Pelz):
> But still, from an organizational view, I suggest not doing a partial
> translation. I don’t know though.
I'd like to weaken this a little: Don't *intentionally* do a partial
translation. With the insights you provided
Maxime Devos writes:
> On 15-09-2022 16:46, Csepp wrote:
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
>>> [...]
>>> Did I say *all items*? Well, … grafts are not included, because graft
>>> derivations are marked as not substitutable.
>>>
>>> Can we change that conditionally? I would really like to avoid hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
