On 28-08-2022 00:04, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
Am Samstag, dem 27.08.2022 um 22:01 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
On 27-08-2022 21:54, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
* Due to how regularised the Rust build system is, it's feasible
to compile tests even when cross-compiling (*), so cross-compiled
Am 07.07.22 um 09:45 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
I’ll be monitoring guix-patches for the final version. :-)
It took some time, and here it is: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57460
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compile
Hi Guix,
The 'staging' branch is in a pretty good shape, let's get it merged!
Highlights from this branch:
* Rust 1.60
* Gstreamer 1.20.3
* Sphinx 5.1.1
* ruby-nokogiri and its dependencies is no longer in the bootstrap path
of TeX Live, so they can be more freely updated on 'master'
I'm fair
Hey Marius,
> The 'staging' branch is in a pretty good shape, let's get it merged!
Nice work!
> I'm fairly rusty when it comes to Cuirass, and don't see a button to
> start the jobset here even when authenticated:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/staging
>
> Can someone remind me how to en
I'm trying to use plugins with the version of Plover packaged in Guix.
For some reason, Plover isn't showing the plugin interface. There is
normally a button which says "plugins". Within Guix, that button
isn't there.
The Plover documentation says that the plugin installer can be accessed throug
On 28-08-2022 19:44, Matt wrote:
However, this fails on
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
error: python-plover: unbound variable
Including (gnu packages stenography) doesn't resolve it. Using guix
edit plover, I see that the definition is in
gnu/packages/stenography.scm.
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 13:47:47 -0400 Maxime Devos wrote ---
> Given that it does not exist, maybe you need 'plover' instead of
> python-plover.
Ah, yes. That works. Thank you.
John Kehayias writes:
> Hello 宋文武,
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 05:02 PM, 宋文武 wrote:
>
>> Hello list, I have some questions about the 'license' of a package,
>> currently defined as:
>>
>> The license of the package; a value from ‘(guix licenses)’, or a
>> list of such values.
>>
>> 1. It'
Maxime Devos writes:
> On 22-08-2022 11:02, 宋文武 wrote:
>
>> Hello list, I have some questions about the 'license' of a package,
>> currently defined as:
>>
>> The license of the package; a value from ‘(guix licenses)’, or a
>> list of such values.
>>
>> 1. It's the license of source fil
