Hello,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> The packages
> - drascula,
> - lure,
> - queen, and
> - sky
> all share issues that make me question whether they should be in Guix.
>
> 1. Their license explicitly prohibits selling of the games themselves
> and may thus be qualified as non-free.
> 2. The
On 24-08-2022 05:07, Philip McGrath wrote:
I could imagine a process like this:
1. Build the binary that needs to be signed.
2. Outside of the Guix build environment, create a detached signature
for the binary using your secret key.
3. Add the detached signature to the Guix store, pe
Am Mittwoch, dem 24.08.2022 um 14:53 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> Hello,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
>
> > The packages
> > - drascula,
> > - lure,
> > - queen, and
> > - sky
> > all share issues that make me question whether they should be in
> > Guix.
> >
> > 1. Their license explic
On 2022-08-24, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 24.08.2022 um 14:53 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
>> Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
>>
>> > The packages
>> > - drascula,
>> > - lure,
>> > - queen, and
>> > - sky
>> > all share issues that make me question whether they should be in
Hi Vagrant,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 15:22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> But, because there is no way to silence a particular inappropriate
> suggestion from guix lint, it becomes noise, and each person evaluating
> the results of the package in the future then needs to take time to
> figure out if
Hi Liliana,
(I have no opinion about this topic.)
Your quote is:
>> The data included in the source package represents the preferred form
>> for modifications.
>> If they were licensed under the G P L it would fail the "preferred
>> form of modification" requirement
but from the mentioned link
On 24-08-2022 10:08, zimoun wrote:
Hi Vagrant,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 15:22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
But, because there is no way to silence a particular inappropriate
suggestion from guix lint, it becomes noise, and each person evaluating
the results of the package in the future then needs
On 2022-08-24, zimoun wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 15:22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
>> But, because there is no way to silence a particular inappropriate
>> suggestion from guix lint, it becomes noise, and each person evaluating
>> the results of the package in the future then needs to take ti
On 24-08-2022 22:24, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
Is it Functional Data:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
"For example, some game engines released under the GNU GPL have
accompanying game information—a fictional world map, game graphics,
and so on—re
On 24-08-2022 22:24, zimoun wrote:
My understanding of the Debian argument is:
1. the licence is BSD-like respecting the Debian Free Software Guidelines
2. point #3 of DFSG [2] says «The license must allow modifications and
derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the s
I got an auto-reply with a ticket number from the FSF, but no answer yet.
I was aware of and unimpressed by Debian's rationalisations on the matter.
Still, this isn't as clear-cut as (say) the Realtek drivers, so IMO we can
afford to wait as long as is needed.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
