FYI:
>From Friday, August 26th, 2022 02:00 pm until Sunday, August 28th 06:00
pm, there will be maintenance work on the MDC network where
ci.guix.gnu.org is hosted. During this time there may be some network
interruptions.
--
Ricardo
Hi Simon,
> However, many things can be out of rail. This claim about
> reproducibility over the time assumes:
>
> 1. compatibility of the Linux kernel
> 2. availability of all the source code
> 3. compatibility of the hardware
>
> Well, until now, nothing had been reported about #1. But, we
Hi Lars,
On sam., 20 août 2022 at 18:47, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote:
>> In all cases, these revised Cabal files are not archived elsewhere than
>> in Hackage, right? The question is thus, where could we archive them?
> And while I updated the
> ve
Hi,
On mar., 16 août 2022 at 09:51, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>> > * gnu/packages/xml.scm (python-lxml): Update to 4.6.5.
>> Now I see that python-lxml-4.7 shadows it.
>>
>> Note: This would have fixed two CVEs, CVE-2021-43818 and CVE-2021-43818.
>
> Can you add a "graft" for this version inst
Thank you for your answer!
Josselin Poiret writes:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Antonio Carlos Padoan Junior writes:
>
>> As far as I understand, Guix doesn't provide means to automatically sign
>> bootloaders and kernels in order to use UEFI secure boot after each system
>> reconfigure (assuming a PKI i
Hello list, I have some questions about the 'license' of a package,
currently defined as:
The license of the package; a value from ‘(guix licenses)’, or a
list of such values.
1. It's the license of source files (guix build -S) or built binary
files?
2. When its value is a list of mul
Hi,
Zhu Zihao writes:
> # Background
>
> Now in Guix. LLVM is built with configure flag
> "-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=TRUE". According to
> https://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html. Build LLVM with `BUILD_SHARED_LIBS` is
> not recommended for non LLVM developing usage. LLVM says that packager
> should use
