On 10-08-2022 08:10, bl...@reproduciblemedia.com wrote:
August 5, 2022 1:59 PM, "Maxime Devos" wrote:
Technical grammatical correction: the software that Guix "has" is that in the
monorepo,
but it "distributes" many packages. Thus:
--8<---cut here---start->8
None of the edits I made were in criticism. In an academic context a proof
reader would mark
almost all the same sentences for revision.
August 10, 2022 9:06 AM, "Maxime Devos" wrote:
> On 10-08-2022 08:10, bl...@reproduciblemedia.com wrote:
>
>> August 5, 2022 1:59 PM, "Maxime Devos" wrote:
On 10-08-2022 12:33, bl...@reproduciblemedia.com wrote:
None of the edits I made were in criticism. In an academic context a proof
reader would mark
almost all the same sentences for revision.
As far as I'm aware, I do not have implied the contrary anywhere previously.
I do think they are cr
On 2022-08-09 22:53, Maxime Devos wrote:
Agreed (*), but I don't think that subsection claims those are the
only reasons for patches -- that section is only about fixing
technical issues, not adding new features, as implied by the name of
the section.
It definitely doesn't claim that. I phras
* doc/contributing.texi ("Snippets versus Phases"): Replaced with...
("Modifying Sources"): ... this. List more use cases and some principles.
---
doc/contributing.texi | 108 +-
1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/contributi
