Re: Shall updaters fall back to other updaters?

Am 01.07.22 um 15:15 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: BTW 2: Which updater is used for each package is non-deterministic. Do you have an example? I’d think they’re always tried in the same order, no? When looking at the code, I don't see any means of sorting:

glibc-locales

The package glibc-locales and glibc-locales-2.32 are nearly identical according to diffoscope. (ins)efraim@3900XT ~$ guix shell diffoscope -- diffoscope /gnu/store/ixzmi6614baf4w37qfjgqrv8hwsl8jcv-glibc-locales-2.33 /gnu/store/zrq9pr31wl128y6nwyh2022i9jqxazpz-glibc-locales-2.32-2.32 --- /gnu/sto

Re: RISCV porting effort

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Howdy, > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > (ins)efraim@3900XT ~/workspace/guix$ time ./pre-inst-env guix weather -s > > riscv64-linux --substitute-urls="http://localhost:3000"; -c100 > > computing 15,205 package derivations for r

Re: glibc-locales

On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 11:53:45AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > The package glibc-locales and glibc-locales-2.32 are nearly identical > according to diffoscope. > > (ins)efraim@3900XT ~$ guix shell diffoscope -- diffoscope > /gnu/store/ixzmi6614baf4w37qfjgqrv8hwsl8jcv-glibc-locales-2.33 > /gn

Re: “Building a Secure Software Supply Chain with GNU Guix”

Hi Simon, and all, On +2022-07-01 11:21:43 +0200, zimoun wrote: > Hi Bengt, > > On jeu., 30 juin 2022 at 23:37, b...@bokr.com wrote: > > > I think IWBN to have some kind of trust code come with that git output, > > like gpg's 1-5 but indicating how well the committer/signer trusts > > that using

Re: Bug in strip phase of gnu-build-system?

Hi, elaexuo...@wilsonb.com writes: > Hello, > > Sanity check, please. > > When `strip-binaries?` is `#f` and a "debug" output is defined, said output > remains empty. Instead, I expect "debug" to get populated with separated debug > files. > > The logic for creating debug files exists in (guix bu

Re: glibc-locales

Am Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:53:09PM +0300 schrieb Efraim Flashner: > I misread the source. I'd like glibc-utf8-locales built with glibc-final. Has glibc-utf8-locales not been removed some time ago? I always had it in my profile, then saw a message during upgrade that it had been removed, and droppe

Teams: please add yourself to etc/teams.scm.in

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > >> Am Freitag, dem 01.07.2022 um 12:28 +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >>> [...] >>> An example: >>> >>>    ./pre-inst-env guile --no-auto-compile -l etc/teams.scm -c '(cc r >>> core)' >>> >>> This prints “git send-email” arguments to Cc

Re: Ten Years of Guix: Call for contributions

On Fri, 2022-07-01 at 15:30 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > The Ten Years of Guix 🎂 event in Paris, 16–18 September, is shaping > up, > and you can register! > >   https://10years.guix.gnu.org/ > > (There’s spam in the comment section of the registration form that we > can’t full

Re: glibc-locales

On 2022-07-03, Andreas Enge wrote: > Am Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:53:09PM +0300 schrieb Efraim Flashner: >> I misread the source. I'd like glibc-utf8-locales built with glibc-final. > > Has glibc-utf8-locales not been removed some time ago? I always had it in > my profile, then saw a message during u

Re: glibc-locales

The intended use is NOT to use a package at all, see https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Application-Setup.html#Locales-1 Strongly put (and very possibly missing something :-), this sounds like maintenance effort to support an antipattern. Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go. Ex

Re: Teams: please add yourself to etc/teams.scm.in

Hello, Am Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 03:04:36PM +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > etc/teams.scm.in is now part of the repository. The configure script > generates the executable etc/teams.scm. > Please feel free to add yourself to teams in that file by adding a > definition like this: thanks for pushing

Re: Shall updaters fall back to other updaters?

--- Original Message --- On Sunday, July 3rd, 2022 at 1:12 AM, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Am 01.07.22 um 15:15 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > > > BTW 2: Which updater is used for each package is non-deterministic. > > > Do you have an example? I’d think they’re always tried in the same > > >

repl macro (metacommand?) for guix CLI (sub)commands

What do guixers think of having a repl macro that allows you to run commands like if you were using the CLI? Inspiration: https://github.com/janet-lang/jpm/commit/6d494db43605b9fc7411875f25ae110cb8f77e0b all best, jgart