It would be a great idea to update guix's ROADMAP before this conference takes
place.
Here are some of my thoughts about what features ought to be in Guix 2.0 as
well as adding
a vision to the ROADMAP file. Please note that these changes are very rough
draft.
>From 0374cfa5cb7f9072092c190d9d
April 14, 2022 3:00 PM, "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution."
wrote:
> Mar 29, 2022, 10:15 by l...@gnu.org:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
> Maxime Devos writes:
>> zimoun schreef op ma 21-03-2022 om 14:34 [+0100]:
>
> * gcc can be compiled with `--enable-de
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, April 13th, 2022 at 4:29 PM, B. Wilson
wrote:
> Hey Guix,
>
> In my channels.scm, in addition to the primary guix channel I have my-channel
> and other-channel. This has worked just fine, until I added a commit in
> my-channel which use-modules som
Joshua Branson writes:
> +The vision of the GNU Guix project is to replace proprietary software with
> +freedom respecting software. We hope to create a general purpose and
> +extensible operating system that works well accross embedded environments to
> +extremely powerful server setups. When
> I like this idea. I propose we make harden? default to #t. That way
> practically most packages will be built with
> hardened features. Let's face it, I am a bit lazy, if I submit a package to
> guix, I am usually going to be it the easy way. If the easy way is harden? #f,
> then that's is how
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 23:39:07 +0800
Zhu Zihao wrote:
> Joshua Branson writes:
>
> > +The vision of the GNU Guix project is to replace proprietary
> > software with +freedom respecting software. We hope to create a
> > general purpose and +extensible operating system that works well
> > accross
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:04:37 +0800
Zhu Zihao wrote:
> > I like this idea. I propose we make harden? default to #t. That
> > way practically most packages will be built with hardened features.
> > Let's face it, I am a bit lazy, if I submit a package to guix, I am
> > usually going to be it the
>People shouldn't have to take extra steps and burn extra CPU cycles for
security. If I have to recompile everything to harden my system, I
likely won't bother.
>Pretty much everyone benefits from hardening, but not everyone has the
resources and know how to do it manually. Just choosing what to ha
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:36:25 -0500
Nathan Dehnel wrote:
> >People shouldn't have to take extra steps and burn extra CPU cycles
> >for
> security. If I have to recompile everything to harden my system, I
> likely won't bother.
> >Pretty much everyone benefits from hardening, but not everyone has
