Hi Ricardo and Simon,
Thanks for your insight! I didn't even know about lscpu. The output for
my laptop is shown below. I tried building on a virtual machine, and
that works fine.
> CPU detection is a bottomless can of worms.
That sounds very credible. But what can we do about this?
There is ob
zimoun schreef op do 03-02-2022 om 03:19 [+0100]:
> The issue is because concurrency. If two time-machines are run
> concurrently, they both update ~/.cache/guix/checkouts/ and the end
> result is hard to predict.
>
> Well, I probably ran inside one terminal “guix time-machine
> --commit= --
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 10:21, Maxime Devos wrote:
> zimoun schreef op do 03-02-2022 om 03:19 [+0100]:
> > The issue is because concurrency. If two time-machines are run
> > concurrently, they both update ~/.cache/guix/checkouts/ and the end
> > result is hard to predict.
[...]
> FWIW it's
Hi Konrad,
>> CPU detection is a bottomless can of worms.
>
> That sounds very credible. But what can we do about this?
>
> There is obviously a trade-off between reproducibility and performance
> here. Can we support both, in a way that users can understand and manage?
So far our default appro
Hi Konrad,
On Thu, 03 Feb 2022 at 10:16, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
>> CPU detection is a bottomless can of worms.
>
> That sounds very credible. But what can we do about this?
Well, I do not know what could be done about this. Today, the picture
for OpenBLAS@0.3.6 build looks like:
* Fail
> zimoun schreef op do 03-02-2022 om 11:42 [+0100]:
> [...]
>
> > FWIW it's a known issue but I can't find it on issues.guix.gnu.org.
> > The (unimplemented) fix is to use worktrees, or don't checkout and use
> > the libgit2 / (guix git) equivalent of
> > "git show 46fc72b2bfee2a30a3c3f3320e7d84b4
Hi zimoun,
zimoun writes:
> But the question is if Disarchive dissambles and preserves external
> patches. Timothy?
I have good news and bad news. :)
The good news is that some versions of this patch are in the PoG
database. There’s two versions of 0.76 and one of 0.72. Of those
three, onl
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:43:57AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> It's been 4 weeks, and nobody offered an opinion. I suggest we stick to
> upstream Linux LTS schedule and drop 4.4, otherwise we'll have even more
> variants to maintain.
Indeed. I don't think it's being used anyways.
The final v
Hi Ricardo and Simon,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> The case of OpenBLAS is an anomaly in that this mechanism seems to
> produce different binaries dependent on where it is built. When I first
Thanks a lot for those explanations, I hadn't realized how peculiar
OpenBLAS is!
> Your problem is that t
Hi Timothy,
On Thu, 03 Feb 2022 at 10:46, Timothy Sample wrote:
>> But the question is if Disarchive dissambles and preserves external
>> patches. Timothy?
[...]
> The bad news is that 0.75 is not there. At first I was going to
> apologize for the shortcomings of the sampling approach... unt
Hi Guixers,
I'd like to announce that I'll start up the Guix meetups again next month
(March 2022).
See you at FOSDEM and Guix Days this month! :)
If you'd like to chat with us regarding the next meetups feel to reply
here or come chat with us at #whereiseveryone on the Libera Chat IRC network.
11 matches
Mail list logo
