Hi,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:54:25AM +0100, Maxime Devos wrote:
>> Hi guix reviewers and committers,
>>
>> WDYT of tagging reviewed patches that look good with a usertag,
>> e.g. 'reviewed-looks-good':
>>
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?tag=reviewed-looks-
Hello Kyle and Leo,
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 05:26:08PM -0500, Kyle Meyer wrote:
>>> Fwiw I don't think Git automatically resolved that conflict:
>>>
>>> $ git checkout 276f40fdc349d2ad62582b23ea55e061b689cfc0^
>>> $ git merge 276f40fdc349d2ad62
Hello everyone!
Expat 2.4.4 with security fixes has been released. There is a summary
blog post [1] and the change log [2] with more details.
If you have patches for Expat that are still required with version
2.4.4, please send them my way. Thank you!
Best
Sebastian
[1] https://blog.h
Hi Gabor,
Gábor Boskovits writes:
[...]
> Q2: Have the situation regarding the funding of these interships been
> settled?
I think so, yes. We should be able to transfer what we need from our
funds held at the FSF to the Guix Europe-held bank account and pay the
Outreachy stipend from there.
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari writes:
> The Linux / linux-libre kernel "longterm" support series version 4.4 is
> scheduled to reach the end of its life next month, in February 2022:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
>
> There is a project by the Civil Infrastructure Platform (CIP) called
Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>
>>> raingloom writes:
>>>
One use case that I hope can be addressed is TeXlive packages. Trying
to figure out which package corresponded to which missing file was a
nightmare the last I had to
Hi,
Investigating [0], I note that, for these 2 commits,
$ git log --oneline 4b1538e6ef^..ab0cf06244
ab0cf06244 gnu: rust: Remove #:rust ,rust-1.52 arguments.
4b1538e6ef gnu: kexec-tools: Fix build on i686-linux.
where the latter is simply the parent of the former,
Hi Konrad,
I get the same error as you. And for more versions than the only one
your tested. For instance, for these commits,
* substitutes and rebuilds
923dcc3597 Fri Jan 14 12:59:33 2022 +0100 gnu: iverilog: Update to 11.0.
79ca578182 Thu Nov 11 21:52:08 2021 -0500 gnu: fpc: Fix build.
ab0cf
Hi,
Investigating [0], and working on rebuild a part of "Preservation of
Guix", I hit a missing patch which breaks time-machine. For instance,
let consider the commit e77412362f from May 2019 (post v1.0.0, I guess).
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix time-ma
Hi,
Investigating [0], and working on rebuild a tiny part of "Preservation
of Guix", I note that mesboot is broken for several old commits:
- 087c94019d from Feb 2020 because of gcc-core-mesboot
- df5a2e4f83 from Mar 2020 because of coreutils-mesboot
- e364758d44 from Sep 2020 because of many
Hi,
Investigating [0], and working on rebuilding a tiny part of "Preservation
of Guix", I note some failures of the time-machine.
Let just display the help message using the time-machine for all the 120
commits updating the package guix. Other said, let just check that it
is possible to time-mac
zimoun schreef op wo 02-02-2022 om 19:42 [+0100]:
> [...]
>
> This asks two questions:
>
> 1. How to get now this patch? Someone? Or is it lost forever?
> 2. How to preserve such patches? Other said, are they part of the
> Disarchive machinery? For now, some patches are probably missed by
zimoun schreef op wo 02-02-2022 om 19:42 [+0100]:
> 1. How to get now this patch? Someone? Or is it lost forever?
I found it! It's in the
https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/ repository (warning:
0.5 GiB). Checkout commit 155510dd18d2f290085f40d2a95a3701db4a224d,
then do
$ guix do
zimoun schreef op wo 02-02-2022 om 19:42 [+0100]:
> 2. How to preserve such patches? Other said, are they part of the
> Disarchive machinery? For now, some patches are probably missed by
> sources.json and thus not ingested by SWH.
Can we tell SWH to ingest svntogit-packages, in such a way th
Hi Maxime,
Thanks for the pointer.
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 23:57, Maxime Devos wrote:
>
> zimoun schreef op wo 02-02-2022 om 19:42 [+0100]:
> > 2. How to preserve such patches? Other said, are they part of the
> > Disarchive machinery? For now, some patches are probably missed by
> > sources
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> Konrad Hinsen writes:
>
>> To see the failure, do
>>
>>guix time-machine \
>> --commit=7357b3d7a52eb5db1674012c50d308d792741c48 \
>> -- build openblas
>>
>> The build log is attached, the first error is
>
> Oops... Two mistakes ! First, I forgot the attachme
Hi Konrad,
What is the output of 'lscpu'?
For instance, on machine A running on Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5218 CPU @
2.30GHz, OpenBLAS for commit 87e7faa2ae641d8302efc8b90f1e45f43f67f6da
builds.
On machine B running Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700K CPU @ 3.80GHz,
OpenBLAS for the same commit fails.
Chee
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Konrad Hinsen writes:
>
>> Konrad Hinsen writes:
>>
>>> To see the failure, do
>>>
>>>guix time-machine \
>>> --commit=7357b3d7a52eb5db1674012c50d308d792741c48 \
>>> -- build openblas
>>>
>>> The build log is attached, the first error is
>>
>> Oops... Two
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Feb 2022 at 18:00, zimoun wrote:
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
[...]
> $ guix time-machine --commit=4b1538e6ef -- show openblas | recsel -P version
> 0.3.9
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
The issue is bec
19 matches
Mail list logo
