Re: Formalizing teams

Hi Maxim, > I've grown to like our apparent lack of structure; we interact globally > on any topic of interest and the discussions all happen in a shared > space, which makes it easy to stay informed with everything that's going > on (do we really need more mailing lists to follow? I don't think

Re: Guix "R" Us - GNU's joy store!

jgart writes: > * Yet to be merged upstream. Are these going to be submitted and merged upstream eventually? I think it would be regrettable to establish a channel where ready-to-merge packages accumulate that never make it into Guix proper because people don’t want to make the little bit of

Re: Guix "R" Us - GNU's joy store!

On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:14:45 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > jgart writes: > > > * Yet to be merged upstream. > > Are these going to be submitted and merged upstream eventually? Hi Ricardo, >From our README: ``` The goal of this guix channel is to provide packages and services that are:

Re: Formalizing teams

Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> Guix is nowhere near the size of the Rust community (yet!), but I can >> already picture teams and members: >> >> co-maintainers (“core team”) >> community >> infrastructure >> internationalization >> security response >> release >> Rust packaging >> R

Re: Formalizing teams

Lars-Dominik Braun writes: > Hi Maxim, > >> I've grown to like our apparent lack of structure; we interact globally >> on any topic of interest and the discussions all happen in a shared >> space, which makes it easy to stay informed with everything that's going >> on (do we really need more maili

Re: Formalizing teams

Kyle Meyer writes: > Fwiw public-inbox indexes the file name from diffs, so you might find > searching with the "dfn:" against the archive at > useful. For example: > > https://yhetil.org/guix-patches/?q=dfn%3Agnu%2Fpackages%2Fpython-web.scm FWIW, mumi also

git hook error

Since a few days I see this when pushing to the repository: --8<---cut here---start->8--- Enumerating objects: 35, done. Counting objects: 100% (35/35), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads Compressing objects: 100% (28/28), done. Writing objects: 100%

Re: git hook error

Ricardo, This is . Kind regards, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: git hook error

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 09:26:54PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Ricardo, > > This is . Also happened in 2017: https://www.mail-archive.com/savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org/msg05571.html

On raw strings in commit field

Hi Guix, when Ricardo recently added guile-aiscm to Guix, I was confused that both the version field of the package and the commit field of the git- reference used in its origin. It turns out, that this is a rare pattern observed in less than 200 packages currently in Guix. The reason to do so

Re: git hook error

Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 09:26:54PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> Ricardo, >> >> This is . > > Also happened in 2017: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org/msg05571.html Thanks for the pointers!

Re: git hook error

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 10:09:06PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > So… uhm, what do you all think about hosting our Git repos by ourselves? > Ideally *not* on the servers of the build farm, but on other hardware? I would ask, why would we want to do that?

Re: git hook error

Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 10:09:06PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> So… uhm, what do you all think about hosting our Git repos by ourselves? >> Ideally *not* on the servers of the build farm, but on other hardware? > > I would ask, why would we want to do that? The motiva

Re: git hook error

Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus 写道： - Savannah’s uptime isn’t quite as high as we’d like I wonder if Savannah monitors and publishes numbers, and how they compare to other popular forges. Why should we do better? We haven't even managed to set up a git mirror after all these years. - we can’

Re: Guix "R" Us - GNU's joy store!

On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:40:20 -0500 jgart wrote: > On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:14:45 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus > wrote: > > > > jgart writes: > > > > > * Yet to be merged upstream. > > > > Are these going to be submitted and merged upstream eventually? > > Hi Ricardo, > > From our README: >

Re: git hook error

On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 16:40:15 -0500 Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 10:09:06PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > So… uhm, what do you all think about hosting our Git repos by > > ourselves? Ideally *not* on the servers of the build farm, but on > > other hardware? > > I would ask,

Re: git hook error

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 11:31:10PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > The motivation for that is not found in just one big problem. It’s a > small trickle of minor annoyances: > > - Savannah’s uptime isn’t quite as high as we’d like Okay. I wonder if we could actually do a better job, or if anybody

Re: git hook error

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 写道： I wonder if Savannah monitors and publishes numbers, and how they compare to other popular forges. I asked; they don't. Kind regards, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Guix "R" Us - GNU's joy store!

On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:27:04 +0100 raingloom wrote: > TLDR how much of the effort spent on this channel is really justified > compared to making the underserved use-cases easier in upstream Guix? If there's any particular packages that should be sent upstream feel free to take them from GuixRUs a

guix system reconfigure after more than a year

Hello all. I did not learn to `guix system reconfigure` until recently--well, didn't know to use it to update important things periodically. So i did one after more than a year since having done one on my workstation. In fact the only time I ever did it was to instantiate my workstation's system,