On 1/11/20 8:01 am, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Brendan Tildesley skribis:
In the guix codebase, on many occasions there appear things like this:
(match-lambda
(($ agetty tty term baud-rate auto-login
login-program login-pause? eight-bits? no-reset? remote?
flow-control?
Dear,
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 01:28, Ryan Prior wrote:
>> Did you consider making it part of Emacs-Guix? That’d give us a single
>> go-to place for all things Guix in Emacs.
>
> I don't use emacs-guix myself. I've tried it a couple times but it's
> junky. Specifically, it incorporates a lot of cu
Dear,
Thank you.
In case you need arguments to convince academics, this satellite Guix
project could help:
https://hpc.guix.info/about/
On Thu, 05 Nov 2020 at 09:55, Peng Mei Yu wrote:
> Jonathan Brielmaier writes:
>>
>> I think we should discuss if Guix can support your effort money wise
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 10:45, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> - Emacs-Guix uses private parts of Guix if I'm not mistaken. Since
> these parts are prone to change, it breaks Emacs-Guix once in a
> while.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ ag '\(@' --scheme $(
Hi Zomoun,
zimoun writes:
> $ ag '\(@' --scheme $(guix build emacs-guix -S)
> /gnu/store/…-emacs-guix-0.5.2-2.58a840d-checkout/scheme/emacs-guix/actions.scm
> 200:((@@ (guix scripts build) log-url) store file))
>
> /gnu/store/…-emacs-guix-0.5.2-2.58a840d-checkout/scheme/emacs-gui
Hi Guix,
emacs-guix (also known as guix.el) has been broken for some time.
I submitted https://gitlab.com/emacs-guix/emacs-guix/-/merge_requests/8
to support guix versions >= 1.1. However, two changes also have to
occur for proper support.
* Some bindings will need to be exposed on the guix sid
Hi,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> I believe it suffers from 2 main issues:
>
> - Geiser is a strong dependency: everything depends from a well-working
> Geiser REPL.
That’s a feature!
> - Geiser 0.12 broke the REPL setup :(
> - Geiser chokes on large outputs, which happens on any Guix buil
Hello Guix!
I’m happy to announce a release candidate for 1.2.0:
source:
https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-1.2.0rc1.tar.gz
binary tarball (to install on a “foreign distro”):
https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-binary-1.2.0rc1.aarch64-linux.tar.xz
https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/
Hi everyone,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Any Emacser around willing to take care of it at least in “maintenance
> mode”? It seems like fixing the issues we currently have wouldn’t be
> too hard. Then we can tag a release.
I think I can do it. I can't promise a lot of new work but I can at
least
Hi John,
John Soo skribis:
> I submitted https://gitlab.com/emacs-guix/emacs-guix/-/merge_requests/8
> to support guix versions >= 1.1. However, two changes also have to
> occur for proper support.
>
> * Some bindings will need to be exposed on the guix side. I submitted
> patches for this al
Hi Ludo,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> As I wrote in another message before reaching this one, my understanding
> is that “we” now have to take over maintenance of Emacs-Guix. As part
> of that process, we can discuss what interfaces would be useful to
> Emacs-Guix and arrange to keep them stable.
Hi Ludo,
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 17:54, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I think it would be beneficial longer-term to have the Emacs-Guix repo
> in the Guix group on Savannah, from the perspective of Conway’s law¹;
> it’s also probably a safe way for the project to deal with contributor
> churn. But if
Hi John,
Thank you for reviving guix.el. :-)
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 07:44, John Soo wrote:
> * The guix package in gnu/packages/package-management.scm will need to
> refer to a commit including those patches.
>
> That leads to a more nebulous question: should there be "stable" and
> "unstable
Hi Vagrant,
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 09:48, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> So now you can install guix from Debian's experimental distribution!
Awesome!
Let see how the popcon will increase. ;-)
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=guix
> I've also patched out a few tests that seemed non-d
14 matches
Mail list logo
