On 2020-08-08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2020-08-08, Mark H. Weaver wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> I saw the 5.8 was out, and gave a quick shot at updating it, but it hung
>>> python indefinitely during the deblobbing process.
>>
>> I was unable to reproduce this problem. I simply add
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 11:30:40PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Note that the default kernel configurations for 5.8 still need to be
> added. Leo, would you like to work on that?
I'm planning to do that when the 5.8 kernel becomes the "stable" kernel.
I assume this will happen soon.
Hi Vagrant,
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> At a longer glance, it looks like I failed to update the hashes
> correctly. The hashes for deblob-check 5.7 and deblob-check 5.8 both
> began with "1n" and I must have somehow glazed over the differences and
> not updated the local commit.
Ah, okay, that m
> the linux-libre project periodically deletes most of its older
> tarballs, even if there are no accidents.
Just FYI that git://linux-libre.fsfla.org/releases.git was created
mainly to solve that problem. Versions are now pretty much permanent.
> It may be useful for users with newer hardware de
Hi Raghav,
applied these to wip-desktop except for 0030-gnu-seed-Disable-tests.patch
(I still want to look into it) and
0026-gnu-flatpak-Update-package-definition.patch (there's a newer flatpak
in the master I rebased to).
Had to adapt the libostree patch slightly because half was already applied
Gábor Boskovits writes:
Hello!
>> Jan Nieuwenhuizen ezt írta (időpont: 2020. márc. 17., Ke
>> 9:02):
>
> Gábor Boskovits writes:
I took the liberty of rebasing wip-postfix on latest master and
found it does not compile
--8<---cut here---start->8---
gcc -fP
