Hi Konrad,
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
> Konrad Hinsen writes:
>
>> Sounds fine. I am not much of a hackathon expert, so I don't propose
>> myself for organizing this, but I can make a preselection of suitable
>> submissions to the ReScience challenge (no proprietary software etc.)
>> with comments
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Jan Synacek skribis:
>
>> $ cat guix-os.scm
>> (use-modules (gnu bootloader)
>> (gnu bootloader grub)
>> (gnu system file-systems))
>>
>> (operating-system
>> (host-name "jsynacek-guix-os")
>> (timezone "Europe/Prague")
>> (locale "en_U
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:32:50 +0200
Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Great! Does this fix any other issue?
> Does it warrant a package upgrade in Guix?
>
This alone didn't fix the problem, but as no other possibility was left
than broken pjproject, I tried to fix it and succeeded.
It is mandatory to p
Jan Wielkiewicz writes:
> I'm not sure whether I should fetch from git or use a tarball after
> doing all this work. Fetching from git adds more complexity to the
> packages, but it gives me more control over it plus I'm not sure if I
> can trust the tarballs anymore, after two cases where some f
Hi,
I'm still working on the download and importer for hex.pm and the rebar3
build-system for Erlang. So far I made good progress, but now I stepped
over a curious issue:
The downloader is modeled like the one for git, bzr and hg, creating a
fixed script controlled by environment variables. The s
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020, Christopher Baines wrote:
Do you have any examples of packages that are currently broken, and
which you'd like to remove?
Perhaps mongo-tools: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/39637
It broke when Go was upgraded to 1.13, and changed the test library. I
fixed some other Go pac
Jack Hill writes:
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2020, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
>> Do you have any examples of packages that are currently broken, and
>> which you'd like to remove?
>
> Perhaps mongo-tools: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/39637
>
> It broke when Go was upgraded to 1.13, and changed the test li
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 06:06:44PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> It seems like you got further in understanding this than I did. Given
> that this seems like a test failure, and I don't think there's anything
> to suggest that the actual functionality doesn't work, the course of
> action I see
