Hello Guix!
I would like to thank Guix Maintainers, Gábor Boskovits and Danny
Milosavljevic; for selecting me as an intern for this project. I am gald to be
part of Guix and excited to get started. :-)
I am opening this email thread for communication, discussion and progression
regarding this pro
Dear,
Is someone really use this interface [1]?
[1] https://guix.gnu.org/packages/
Because, when I need something, I prefer to use this one [2].
[2] http://hpc.guix.info/browse
Does it make sense to replace the interface of [1] by the interface by [2]?
Bonus: the interface [2] provides a li
Hi Guix,
when installing a few packages we see output like this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix install zile-on-guile vim-full
The following packages will be installed:
zile-on-guile 2.4.14-0.fd09781
vim-full 8.2.0411
9.4 MB will be downloaded
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> The exact same function named 'call-with-temporary-directory' is
> defined in the 2 files:
> - guix/utils.scm
> - guix/swh.scm
> Please, could you explain what is the motivation? CIrcular dependencies?
>
> The comment in guix/swh.scm says ';FIXME: factorize'. Does it mean
Hi,
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> On Sun, 03 May 2020 21:26:23 +0200
> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> I understand cross-base.scm is becoming messy and we would need an
>> abstraction to facilitate its use. Still, to me it sounds like a better
>> option over big monolithic packages.
>>
>> WDYT?
Hello Guix!
I wrote about the recent changes in support of grafts in this post:
https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/grafts-continued/
Feedback welcome!
Ludo’.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Vincent Legoll skribis:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:23 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> The patch below appears to fix it:
>
> Is target-word-size checking always equivalent to cross-compiling ?
In this case it’s sufficient: it’s just about ‘sizeof’ and ‘alignof’, so
the word size is all that
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> when installing a few packages we see output like this:
>
> $ guix install zile-on-guile vim-full
> The following packages will be installed:
>zile-on-guile 2.4.14-0.fd09781
>vim-full 8.2.0411
>
> 9.4 MB will be downloaded:
>/gnu/store/vf7w4yiax38ra7x8aqqv
Hi!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> (use-modules (guix build syscalls))
>
> (define LOOPBACK? #t)
> (define IP "127.0.0.1" )
> (define INTERFACE "lo")
> (define NETMASK #f)
> (define GATEWAY #f)
>
> (format #t "ifreq-struct-size: ~a\n" (@@ (guix build syscalls)
> ifreq-struct-size))
> (format #t "
Hi,
raingloom skribis:
> It'd actually be nice if static linking could be used in places other
> than the initrd. I'm experimenting with some old resource constrained
> machines, and it made me realize just how much space even a basic `guix
> pull` can take up.
That’s an issue in Guile’s compil
Hi!
Raghav Gururajan skribis:
> I would like to thank Guix Maintainers, Gábor Boskovits and Danny
> Milosavljevic; for selecting me as an intern for this project. I am gald to be
> part of Guix and excited to get started. :-)
Yay, great that you made it! Welcome again! :-)
> I am opening thi
Dear Chris,
I am playing with "guix search / show" ('package->recutils) and I
would like to provide 2 informations:
1) the hyperlink to the Data Service.
2) if the package is substituable.
The 1) is not complicated since Guix checks if hyperlinks are
supported by the terminal. The question is
Hi Ludo!
Interesting blog post, thanks!
I found a typo:
/remove-eval/remote-eval/
Thanks, Nicolò
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I wrote about the recent changes in support of grafts in this post:
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/grafts-continued/
>
> Feedback welcome!
>
> Ludo’.
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> Is someone really use this interface [1]?
>
> [1] https://guix.gnu.org/packages/
>
> Because, when I need something, I prefer to use this one [2].
>
> [2] http://hpc.guix.info/browse
>
>
> Does it make sense to replace the interface of [1] by the interface by [2]?
A goal f
Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> While I’m sure many of us have gotten used to this I think we don’t need
> to show quite as much information. My proposal is to hide the
> “downloading from ” by default, because the URLs don’t
> really matter to users. We can unhide that bit of info when slightly
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 16:08, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> > when installing a few packages we see output like this:
> >
> > $ guix install zile-on-guile vim-full
> > The following packages will be installed:
> >zile-on-guile 2.4.14-0.fd09781
> >vim-full 8.2.041
Hi Ludo,
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 16:25, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I think it’s nice to see the URLs, or rather the host part thereof, when
> using multiple substitute servers. But perhaps we can still make that
> less verbose?
Kind of 'guix-prettify-mode'?
For example shortened as 'https://ci.g
Hey ho!
Brice Waegeneire skribis:
> You may have seen me around in the mailing lists or on IRC as bricewge.
> For
> some months now I have been contributing to Guix on a regular basis. And
> it
> seems I have been helpful in some ways since yesterday I was granted
> commit
> access to the git re
Hi,
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:32:00PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> I was wondering about MIPS support, mainly because the Guix Data Service
>> uses QEMU to emulate different systems so that the channel instance
>> derivations can be computed (like [1]). I'm not su
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 16:23, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Does it make sense to replace the interface of [1] by the interface by [2]?
>
> A goal for [1] was to have a JS-free interface. It’s necessarily
> limiting (no search interface), but I think it’s good to have.
I understand. Even if I am a
Good idea!
But can we do even shorter?
- Move the graft information which is somewhat low-level to --verbose=N.
- Remove the duplicate profile information ("The following
derivation..." and "building "/gnu...-profile.drv").
- If we move the URL to --verbose=N, why not doing the same for the sto
Hi,
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 15:54, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > The comment in guix/swh.scm says ';FIXME: factorize'. Does it means:
> > move it in the file 'guix/utils.scm'?
>
> I believe the (shameful) reason is that the closure of (guix swh) is
> imported no the build side and adding (guix utils)
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès ezt írta (időpont: 2020. máj. 6., Sze 16:19):
> Hi!
>
> Raghav Gururajan skribis:
>
> > I would like to thank Guix Maintainers, Gábor Boskovits and Danny
> > Milosavljevic; for selecting me as an intern for this project. I am gald
> to be
> > part of Guix and excited to g
Hi Danny,
guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> commit b17b29454d5edd61eecb4536461789b7a3865a9a
> Author: Danny Milosavljevic
> AuthorDate: Wed May 6 17:36:03 2020 +0200
>
> gnu: gnome-todo: Fix build.
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/gnome-todo-delete-esource-duplicate.patch: New
> file.
>
Raghav Gururajan writes:
> I would like to thank Guix Maintainers, Gábor Boskovits and Danny
> Milosavljevic; for selecting me as an intern for this project. I am gald to be
> part of Guix and excited to get started. :-)
Congratulations!
You’ve already done a lot of great work in the past wee
On Wed, 06 May 2020 09:13:34 + Raghav Gururajan
wrote
> Hello Guix!
>
> I would like to thank Guix Maintainers, Gábor Boskovits and Danny
> Milosavljevic; for selecting me as an intern for this project. I am gald to
> be
> part of Guix and excited to get started. :-)
Nice,
Hello Ricardo!
> Congratulations!
>
> You’ve already done a lot of great work in the past weeks, so I’m
> looking forward to seeing your project results.
Thank you!
Regards,
RG.
Hello Sirgazil!
> Nice, Raghav. I wish you success :)
Thank you!
Regards,
RG.
Hi Marius,
On Wed, 06 May 2020 17:43:18 +0200
Marius Bakke wrote:
> Can you add a short comment at the top of the patch file explaining what
> this does, along with links to relevant upstream commits/issues (if
> applicable)?
Whoops.
Sure. Added in guix master commit 426adb4fc50cdfbc29fdc6ab6
Hello,
> In the intervening years, interest faded away as free software friendly
> MIPS hardware became more rare.
I grabbed a gnubee during the crowdfunding campaign, but the CPU
is too low spec to do a lot of compilation on it.
> Perhaps it would be more honest to officially remove the MIPS po
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jack Hill wrote:
>
> * Continued development of guix deploy. Figuring out how to deploy secrets
> to remote machines would be great.
I used to think this was a problem that guix deploy had to deal with
but after many years doing devops full-time I no longer think t
zimoun writes:
> Is someone really use this interface [1]?
>
> [1] https://guix.gnu.org/packages/
>
> Because, when I need something, I prefer to use this one [2].
>
> [2] http://hpc.guix.info/browse
>
>
> Does it make sense to replace the interface of [1] by the interface by [2]?
>
>
> Bonus: t
On Wed, 06 May 2020 14:46:02 + zimoun
wrote
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 16:23, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> > > Does it make sense to replace the interface of [1] by the interface by
> > > [2]?
> >
> > A goal for [1] was to have a JS-free interface. It’s necessarily
> > limiti
Raghav Gururajan writes:
> I would like to thank Guix Maintainers, Gábor Boskovits and Danny
> Milosavljevic; for selecting me as an intern for this project. I am gald to be
> part of Guix and excited to get started. :-)
Well, done; congratulations!
Greetings,
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | G
Hello,
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:06 PM zimoun wrote:
> Is someone really use this interface [1]?
>
> [1] https://guix.gnu.org/packages/
Yes, me, sometimes...
> Because, when I need something, I prefer to use this one [2].
>
> [2] http://hpc.guix.info/browse
Because I did not know about this one
Hello Jan!
> Well, done; congratulations!
Thank you! :-)
Regards,
RG.
pgp8R_GIMVkk0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 6 May 2020, Vincent Legoll wrote:
Hello,
In the intervening years, interest faded away as free software friendly
MIPS hardware became more rare.
I grabbed a gnubee during the crowdfunding campaign, but the CPU
is too low spec to do a lot of compilation on it.
I also have a gnubee,
zimoun writes:
> I am playing with "guix search / show" ('package->recutils) and I
> would like to provide 2 informations:
>
> 1) the hyperlink to the Data Service.
> 2) if the package is substituable.
>
> The 1) is not complicated since Guix checks if hyperlinks are
> supported by the termina
Vincent Legoll writes:
>> In the intervening years, interest faded away as free software friendly
>> MIPS hardware became more rare.
>
> I grabbed a gnubee during the crowdfunding campaign, but the CPU
> is too low spec to do a lot of compilation on it.
At least the main blocker for me is the
Hi Chris,
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 19:36, Christopher Baines wrote:
> > Aside, does it make sense to add the revision number (short commit
> > hash, e.g., abc123) and the red (X) or the green (V) close to "More
> > information" to easily check the status of the derivation. It avoids
> > one click
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 06:27:31PM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> From the manual or from the CI, to let the build farm do more useful things
> I'm not against, but is it really making maintenance difficult by still being
> in
> the codebase ?
It's not really a maintenance burden currently since
Hi sirgazil,
Thank you for the explanations.
I have not read yet the bug report you mention.
Well, I do not have any opinion on what to do. Mainly because I do
not have the skills for. And that's why I proposed the change. :-)
All the best,
simon
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 06:27:31PM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> I grabbed a gnubee during the crowdfunding campaign, but the CPU
> is too low spec to do a lot of compilation on it.
I'm not an expert on MIPS but I *think* the GnuBee uses a different
architecture than what Guix was ported to.
So,
zimoun writes:
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 19:36, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
>> > Aside, does it make sense to add the revision number (short commit
>> > hash, e.g., abc123) and the red (X) or the green (V) close to "More
>> > information" to easily check the status of the derivation. It avoids
>
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 01:03:39PM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jack Hill wrote:
> >
> > * Continued development of guix deploy. Figuring out how to deploy secrets
> > to remote machines would be great.
>
> I used to think this was a problem that guix deploy had
Dave,
On Wed, 6 May 2020, Thompson, David wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jack Hill wrote:
* Continued development of guix deploy. Figuring out how to deploy secrets
to remote machines would be great.
I used to think this was a problem that guix deploy had to deal with
but after man
Hi,
On +2020-05-06 16:25:19 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
> > While I’m sure many of us have gotten used to this I think we don’t need
> > to show quite as much information. My proposal is to hide the
> > “downloading from ” by default, because the URLs don’
Hi all,
With the release of the 1.0 version of Inkscape I wanted to update our package
and I'm encountering some problems I'm unable to solve myself.
First, it depends on GDL (Gnome Devtool Libraries) which is not included in
Guix so I'm packaging that too. I found an issue I don't know how to
Hi, I wanted the same. My package is working but I cannot replace the
current inkscape as there's a dependency loop, so I called it
inkscape-1.0. But in today's blogpost Ludo installed inkscape 1.0, so
maybe he already solved it. Here's my working definition btw, if you
want to submit it please g
Hello everybody,
I'll do a single email answer, hope that is not off limits...
The gnubee is dual-core x 2 threads, 880 MHz 32 bit mips, 512 MB RAM, 2x1Gbps
ethernet, 6 SATA ports, SPI flash & microSD, USB 2 & 3, u-boot bootloader.
http://gnubee.org
https://www.mediatek.com/products/homeNetworki
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 22:01, Bengt Richter wrote:
> Just so I don't have to re-run something very timeconsuming to see the
> verbose version.
In this case, you can always run the command using the verbose option.
It is the same with all the CLI I know, one cannot have the milk and
the butter fo
Hello!
It seems we're now at least 3 people to have worked toward Inkscape 1.0
:-). I've posted a patch series adding a Inkscape 1.0 and various other
dependencies at http://bugs.gnu.org/41118, if you'd like to compare.
Nicolò Balzarotti writes:
> Hi, I wanted the same. My package is working b
52 matches
Mail list logo
