Hello Guix!
I want issues.guix.gnu.org to become more useful for all of us. It’s
easy to get lost in a deluge of bug reports and patch submissions, so
our tools should allow us to stay afloat.
Do you use issues.guix.gnu.org? If you aren’t: what workflow do you
have to review patch submissions?
Christopher Baines writes:
> Daniela Lura writes:
>> In addition to that, I noticed that when I go to
>> http://localhost:/revision/554f5b62805b900a9e4e320c800c13557b7e/system-tests
>> I
>> don't get any data in the name, description, location, derivation and
>> build status fields ev
> Personally, I’d wish for a more streamlined workflow to download and
> apply patch sets. I don’t want to click on each “download” link in the
> web interface. Instead I would like to run something like
>
> ./etc/review 12345
>
> which would fetch the patches in issue 12345 and apply them t
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:49 AM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Hello Guix!
>
> I want issues.guix.gnu.org to become more useful for all of us.
Yes, that is a nice goal, I have a few ideas.
> If you do use it: what features do you think are missing?
* I'd like to have a way to reverse the ord
Another idea:
Detect applied patches (idependently of the Done issue status)
because an issue may have more than one patch, or patch
revisions, and all may not be applicable / applied, etc.
--
Vincent Legoll
Looks like the "is:Done" bug is not a bug, but a case-sensitivity
issue on my side...
--
Vincent Legoll
FYI, I'm investigating the test suite failures for the newer
releases of genimage (v11 (+1 FAIL) & v12 (+2 FAIL))...
I think I'll report / PR them upstream before updating
guix's version, to avoid unnecessary churn.
--
Vincent Legoll
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:55:04AM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> FYI, I'm investigating the test suite failures for the newer
> releases of genimage (v11 (+1 FAIL) & v12 (+2 FAIL))...
>
> I think I'll report / PR them upstream before updating
> guix's version, to avoid unnecessary churn.
>
I fo
filtering by severity maybe be of use (low, easy for newcomers, etc.)
--
Vincent Legoll
Vincent Legoll writes:
> filtering by severity maybe be of use (low, easy for newcomers, etc.)
This already works for all severities that Debbugs supports. For
example:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/search?query=severity%3Aserious+is%3Aopen
(28211 is included because of a bug: the issue h
Hi,
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
>> Yes: you need to have ‘installation-os-for-gui-tests’ (or preferably a
>> variant thereof) include all the services/packages needed for the target
>> config.
>>
>> In the manual installation tests we use ‘define-os-with-source’ to both
>> embed the target OS and
Hello Chris,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> These patches are very rough, and not ready, but do at least work in some
> limited capacity. I've been testing with the following commands:
>
> guix pack --format=docker guile@2.2.6
> guix pack --format=docker guile@2.2.7
>
> With the previous Dock
Hi,
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 04:37:05PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Thoughts? How do other distros deal with this? Are we missing some
>> trick to compress locale data?
>
> I noticed that downloading glibc-locales, it's 10.8 MiB. On disk, the
> store item is ~220 Mi
Hi Ricardo!
> Please try adding pkg-config to the native-inputs.
I tried it, but didn't work.
> If this still doesn’t work check the output of bctoolbox: does it
> install a pkg-config file? If it does: does the file mention any
> libraries that must be propagated?
I believe the build script d
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:55 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Another approach would be to do like ‘guix system vm’, which is to share
> the store with the host. But then we would need a way to be able to run
> a daemon in the guest and have its build results overlaid on top of the
> host-provided st
Hi Danny!
> So I checked that directory and it indeed does not have that file.
>
> But it does have
> /gnu/store/m92m6bg0xcl28djxg8h97sszf3gdl42r-bctoolbox-4.3.1/share/bctoolbox/cmake/bctoolboxConfig.cm
> ke
> -- note the different case of the name.
Thanks so much for spotting this.
> So I'd sa
Hi Danny!
> ... and I checked ./cmake/BcToolboxConfig.cmake.in in bctoolbox and that does
> look okay.
>
> But they have a renamer in CMakeLists.txt and that checks
>
> set(EXPORT_TARGETS_NAME "bctoolbox")
>
> So probably you could specify that one. No idea why it exists and is different
> fro
Veera writes:
I have successfully done a basic build and install of XChat IRC
Client.
From what I can tell [0], the latest commit to XChat was in 2011.
Is this the software you packaged, or did you perhaps intend to
refer to HexChat [1], a maintained fork?
I had chat about this in #Gui
Raghav Gururajan writes:
> Hi Ricardo!
>
>> Please try adding pkg-config to the native-inputs.
>
> I tried it, but didn't work.
>
>> If this still doesn’t work check the output of bctoolbox: does it
>> install a pkg-config file? If it does: does the file mention any
>> libraries that must be
Hi Ricardo!
> Does bctoolbox install a pc file?
bctoolbox source tarball does have bctoolbox.pc.in file. But adding pkg-config
as native-inputs for linphone-desktop did not work. Should I be doing adding
something else?
Hi!
Vincent Legoll skribis:
> Trying to update automake to the latest, I'm seeing lots
> of skipped tests because of missing native-inputs, would
> it be OK toadd those to enable more tests to be run ?
I hadn’t seen your message and added Automake 1.16.2 in commit
72a5cc53586080e75ae4ee80f3a246
Hi Raghav,
I tried
(arguments
`(#:configure-flags
(list "-DENABLE_DBUS=YES"
"-DENABLE_UPDATE_CHECK=YES")
#:phases
(modify-phases %standard-phases
(add-after 'unpack 'patch
(lambda _
(substitute* "CMakeLists.txt"
Hi Mathieu!
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
> Let say I want to create a disk-image with one ext4 partition starting
> at offset 10M. I can write the following genimage config file:
>
> image system {
> hdimage {}
>
> partition rootfs {
> partition-type = 0x83
>
Hi Vagrant,
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> e...@boldquot.po:4591: format specifications in 'msgstr[0]' are not a
> subset of those in 'msgid_plural'
> /gnu/store/p50cw1g05g566bkbr6ylcibqffhha8w4-profile/bin/msgfmt: found 1
> fatal error
What’s the message on that line?
I haven’t hit the problem
Hi Danny!
> I tried
>
> (arguments
> `(#:configure-flags
> (list "-DENABLE_DBUS=YES"
> "-DENABLE_UPDATE_CHECK=YES")
> #:phases
> (modify-phases %standard-phases
> (add-after 'unpack 'patch
> (lambda _
> (substitute* "CMakeLists.txt"
> (("find_package[(]BcToolbox REQUIRED[)]")
> "find_package(bcto
Vincent Legoll skribis:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:55 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Another approach would be to do like ‘guix system vm’, which is to share
>> the store with the host. But then we would need a way to be able to run
>> a daemon in the guest and have its build results overlaid o
Hello Guix,
Thanks to Danny's work in[0] we have, since a few days, a way for
packages
to provide Linux modules in the system profile. I have been waiting for
such a feature since I packaged `ddcci-driver-linux', which was kind of
useless without it. Using the new field `kernel-loadable-modules
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:09:27PM -0500, LaFreniere, Joseph wrote:
>
> Veera writes:
>
> > I have successfully done a basic build and install of XChat IRC Client.
>
> From what I can tell [0], the latest commit to XChat was in 2011. Is this
> the software you packaged, or did you perhaps inten
> I’m completely sold to the idea. :-)
Yep, LGTM too
> Apparently ‘genimage’ supports many file systems, including ext[234] and
> ISO9660, which are the two formats we support via ‘--file-system-type’.
> It does not support Btrfs, but ‘guix system disk-image’ doesn’t support
> it either so far.
Hello,
I was thinking of improving `modify-services' by adding the ability to
specify a service to modify based on it's name and not just it's type.
This
would allow us to modify singleton services like the ones returned by
`simple-service'. I'm not sure if that's a good idea, that's why I
pre
Hi Brice,
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:34:03 +
Brice Waegeneire wrote:
> First I was expecting the packages in `kernel-loadable-modules' to use
> the
> `kernel' field as their kernel input or to have a simple procedure to do
> so. Otherwise you get a “Specified Linux kernel and Linux kernel modul
On 2020-03-26 15:13, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
Hi Brice,
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:34:03 +
Brice Waegeneire wrote:
First I was expecting the packages in `kernel-loadable-modules' to use
the
`kernel' field as their kernel input or to have a simple procedure to
do
so. Otherwise you get a “Sp
Hello Danny,
Sorry for the empty email; cancel and send buttons were too close for
me...
On 2020-03-26 15:13, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
Hi Brice,
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:34:03 +
Brice Waegeneire wrote:
First I was expecting the packages in `kernel-loadable-modules' to use
the
`kernel' f
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:07 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Trying to update automake to the latest, I'm seeing lots
> > of skipped tests because of missing native-inputs, would
> > it be OK toadd those to enable more tests to be run ?
>
> I hadn’t seen your message and added Automake 1.16.2 in com
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 03:26:05AM +0100, Bengt Richter wrote:
> On +2020-03-26 00:00:18 +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> > on one of my computers uvesafb can only be used after „chmmod o+rw
> > /dev/fb0“ which is a security issue, I suppose.
> >
>
> Are you a member of the video group?
So I was able to fix all the "Qt[...].cmake not found error by adding required
inputs. But during build I get lot of errors related to Qt. I am not able to
understand what those are. They all contain some king of flags.
Here is a new of my project.
https://bin.disroot.org/?5c92968202a11fe5#5Tro
Vincent Legoll writes:
>> We’d probably have to decide on a case by case basis which additional
>> dependencies we’d like to add, given that Automake has a lot of
>> dependents.
>
> For the tests they will be native-inputs, so only increase dependencies
> for building, is that a problem ? I would
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 08:06:44PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Vincent Legoll writes:
> > For the tests they will be native-inputs, so only increase dependencies
> > for building, is that a problem ? I would have thought that test coverage
> > is more important (especially on such important packa
Hi Raghav,
> So I was able to fix all the "Qt[...].cmake not found error by adding
> required inputs. But during build I get lot of errors related to Qt. I am not
> able to understand what those are. They all contain some king of flags.
I don't know. It sounds like the versions of the linphone
Hi Danny!
> I don't know. It sounds like the versions of the linphone modules are not
> compatible.
> Please ask upstream about it (for example file a bug report with them).
It appears half of the errors were related to C++ standard. When I used ("gcc"
,gcc-5) as native-inputs, the number of er
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Christopher Baines skribis:
>
>> I think it could be useful to support multiple different strategies for
>> generating layers for Docker images, with different trade-offs. This approach
>> using two layers should make the resulting images more efficient to use in
>> t
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> I want issues.guix.gnu.org to become more useful for all of us. It’s
> easy to get lost in a deluge of bug reports and patch submissions, so
> our tools should allow us to stay afloat.
>
> Do you use issues.guix.gnu.org? If you aren’t: what workflow do you
> have to re
So I was able to fix all the "Qt[...].cmake not found error by adding required
inputs. But during build I get lot of errors related to Qt. I am not able to
understand what those are.
BUILD LOG:
https://bin.disroot.org/?79c1cc2131f7235f#HHS3xWeLCKd98L1fqZB6xEwnkPQWqyJXpoemhwppzRNV
NEW DIFF:
ht
Hi Mathieu,
from the standpoint of ARM it would be really good to be able to reuse
genimage config files from buildroot.
In fact, partition layout is a major pain in the ass to get right on ARM.
If we want to support a large number of ARM platforms, that would
mean the partitioning would be fixed
Hi Ricardo!
I love the idea of a smoother download/review process. I think I would
be happier with a curl-able endpoint to download patches from. I think
it might compose with other tools a little more smoothly. Other than
that, nothing really comes to my mind.
I only just started using it more f
Dear all,
Below, I share my second draft.
1. Overview: still needs to be completed with material from the
unfinished sections.
2. Problem Statement: fully developed, only need to add some data (you
will note [the placeholders])
3. Solution Overview: this is definitely the less developed section
46 matches
Mail list logo
