rolling back the system shows it's trying to get substitutes for grub.cfg.drv
and install-bootloader.scm.drv:
```
itsme@antelope ~> sudo guix system roll-back
Password:
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://berlin.guixsd.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://mirro
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Hi Mathieu!
>
> Thanks for the details, this makes much more sense now! :)
> So how can I thunk the source field then?
>
There's computed-origin-method that's floating around a couple of
package modules or you can look at someth
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:40:09 +0100
Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> P.S.: Have you managed to set up a public Git clone of Guix to share
> you patches?
>
Okay, good news: I finally have a public repo at
https://notabug.org/kromka_chleba/guix-jami/src/jami-wip
My changes are on the jami-wip branch. Wo
Hello.
I am very happy with manually setting up my boot programs. On UEFI systems I
don’t use a standalone bootloader at all, because I think it is so unnecessary,
and rely on Linux ‘EFI stub’ functionality. I don’t ever want any automatic
scripts to intervene.
For a couple of years I have u
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> I tested again on an Intel HD Graphics 620.
> Everything works for me so far (navigating, smooth scrolling, rendering).
>
> I tested the following:
>
> - https://gnu.org
> - https://ambrevar.xyz (has some CSS that may required hardware acceleration)
> - https://github.c
Hello!
While preparing a new release of GNU Inetutils, I read the following
comment in ./gnu/system.scm
net-tools; XXX: remove when Inetutils suffices
and looked into what possible tools Guix would want from inetutils that
aren't available already.
I'm not sure
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> Mike, have you tried building the package against ungoogled-chromium?
>
> Either way, I vote for including this package into Guix, it seems mature
> enough.
> We can open an issue to replace the bundled chromium with
> ungoogled-chromium if need be.
Sorry for the long
Le 1 janvier 2020 10:31:08 GMT-05:00, kanic...@yandex.ru a écrit :
>Hello.
>
>I am very happy with manually setting up my boot programs. On UEFI
>systems I don’t use a standalone bootloader at all, because I think it
>is so unnecessary, and rely on Linux ‘EFI stub’ functionality. I don’t
>ever wa
Yes, AFAIR it only works with ‘init’ and has no effect at all with
‘reconfigure’.
02.01.2020, 00:12, "Julien Lepiller" :
> Le 1 janvier 2020 10:31:08 GMT-05:00, kanic...@yandex.ru a écrit :
>> Hello.
>>
>> I am very happy with manually setting up my boot programs. On UEFI
>> systems I don’t use
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> Let me know if there are more changes you'd like to include to your
> patch.
> If no one objects, I'll merge it within a week.
>
> Cheers!
I think the package is looking pretty good now. I sent some changes
requested by Hartmut today so we might need to wait on any mor
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> mike.ros...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> My conclusion is this is going to be way more work then the
>> benefits. And once this was achieved it still needs to be
>> maintained. Keep in mind QT already has a patch re base process with
>> changes that might conflict with ungo
11 matches
Mail list logo
