Hello,
Thanks for the work and the proposal! :)
I find it very interesting! As Guix is somewhat (?) a rolling release,
having a regular source of news and progress report would be very
welcome, I think. It lowers the level of commitment needed to follow the
guix project, specially for newcomers,
Hi Marius!
Le 11/01, Marius Bakke a écrit :
> Tanguy Le Carrour writes:
> > Oh, oh… what I forgot to mention is that… it's a shameless copy/paste of
> > the python-3.7 package and it would deserve a rewrite! Something like
> > `(inherit python-3.7)` and a modification of [source](patches) and
>
Hello,
Tanguy Le Carrour ezt írta (időpont: 2019. nov. 4.,
H, 10:16):
> Hi Marius!
>
>
> Le 11/01, Marius Bakke a écrit :
> > Tanguy Le Carrour writes:
> > > Oh, oh… what I forgot to mention is that… it's a shameless copy/paste
> of
> > > the python-3.7 package and it would deserve a rewrite! S
Hello Jan,
Jan Wielkiewicz ezt írta (időpont:
2019. nov. 3., V, 22:20):
> Dnia 2019-11-03, o godz. 11:15:56
> Pierre Neidhardt napisał(a):
>
> > Can you share the complete recipe?
> >
>
> Yes. I guess you want a patch of my entire work so far, because
> pjproject-jami is meaningless without cha
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Another way is:
>
> eval `guix package --search-paths=prefix`
>
> or similar.
Note that this suffers from the shell compatibility issue, e.g. it won't
work with Fish / Eshell.
> Another one is:
>
> guix environment …
This is a bit different since it spawns a subsh
Ok, 'smallerizing' isn't a real word.
I'm trying again to see about porting Guix to 32-bit powerpc and I've
come across a problem with the static guile. static guile has bin/
share/ and lib/ outputs. Looking at (gnu packages bootstrap), the
make-guile-wrapper function around line 377 takes its own
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 11:39, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> >> - A Scheme function to create a manifest for the necessary inputs of a
> >> package, like =guix environment PACKAGE= does. (Maybe it's already
> >> possible?)
> >
> > Like ‘specifications->manifest’?
>
> Can specifications->manife
Hi Chris,
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 07:24, Chris Marusich wrote:
> Has anyone run "guix pull" successfully recently? I have been trying
> for days without success.
I do not experiment any issue; it runs successfully.
What is your "guix describe" version?
(it also succeeds with the commit 9ffbc245
Dear Guix,
I'm trying to contribute to GNU Guix again, and I'd like to see if I
can solve build failures to make for a more stable Guix. It would be
very convenient to have a list of packages that are currently failing
to build, and perhaps also some history on it (how many times did the
build fa
Hello,
Tanguy Le Carrour ezt írta (időpont: 2019. nov. 4.,
H, 11:50):
> Hi Gàbor,
>
>
> Le 11/04, Gábor Boskovits a écrit :
> > Hello,
> > Tanguy Le Carrour ezt írta (időpont: 2019. nov.
> 4.,
> > > Thanks for the snippet! I updated my package definition accordingly
> (see
> > > attachment), bu
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 12:19:42PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> 1: http://prototype-guix-weekly-news.cbaines.net/en_US/2019/41.html
> 2: http://prototype-guix-weekly-news.cbaines.net/en_US/2019/42.html
I think it would be useful to show a rolling report of upgraded/added
packages. We used to
Pjotr Prins writes:
> Not only good for humans, also good for search engines. I find the
> current package list https://guix.gnu.org/packages/ pretty useful, but
> I would like a search function because one keeps clicking to find a
> certain package.
There is such a search function here:
https:
On Mon 04 Nov 2019 11:57, Efraim Flashner writes:
> Is there a good way to actually compile the .go files and use them to
> replace the ones shipped in the guile-static tarball?
> Can we do this on purpose and ship just the bin/ output, grab guile
> sources and compile it for real? Or can I delet
Le 4 novembre 2019 13:28:57 GMT+01:00, Roel Janssen a écrit :
>Dear Guix,
>
>I'm trying to contribute to GNU Guix again, and I'd like to see if I
>can solve build failures to make for a more stable Guix. It would be
>very convenient to have a list of packages that are currently failing
>to build,
On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 14:51 +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Le 4 novembre 2019 13:28:57 GMT+01:00, Roel Janssen a
> écrit :
> > Dear Guix,
> >
> > I'm trying to contribute to GNU Guix again, and I'd like to see if
> > I
> > can solve build failures to make for a more stable Guix. It would
> > be
Hello,
Jonathan Frederickson skribis:
> On Nov 3, 2019, at 9:24 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote
>> Now, this would be very much stateful: you can’t tell in advance whether
>> you’re going to build a new profile based on the current Guix, or
>> whether you’re going to reuse a previously cached profile
Hello Guix!
Jakob wrote a great tutorial on how to use ‘guix deploy’ to deploy Guix
System to one machine or to several virtual private servers (VPSs):
https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/managing-servers-with-gnu-guix-a-tutorial/
Give it a spin, and spread the word!
Ludo’.
Hi Marius,
Marius Bakke skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Marius Bakke skribis:
>>
>>> I plan to remove 'ungoogled-chromium' and 'ungoogled-chromium-wayland'
>>> in a few days, unless someone is willing to port the patches. I can
>>> help extracting just the few changes we
Hi Guix!
I intended to ask this question later, but now that ungoogled-chromium
has been superseded by icecat, I find myself stuck!
Is it possible to package a single file? The "file" being a bash script or
a binary. Is there a package definition I can look into for an example?
I would do this f
Roel Janssen writes:
> With Hydra, when clicking on a failed build you could see
> previous builds of that same package and its success or failure of
> them. I found that very useful.
For previous builds you can use a query like
icecat spec:guix-master system:x86_64-linux
and it will sho
Chris Marusich writes:
> Has anyone run "guix pull" successfully recently? I have been trying
> for days without success.
I ran it just about an hour ago on x86_64 and it worked just fine.
--
Ricardo
Hi,
I'm trying to package nesc which has some small tools written in Java.
It compiles them using "javac" and then packs the result using "jar".
If I want
guix build --rounds=2 nesc
to pass, how do I best proceed?
I tried
(substitute* "tools/Makefile.in"
((" jar c
Hi, Chris.
On Mon, 04 Nov 2019 01:24:16 -0500 Chris Marusich
wrote
> Hi,
>
> After 8 hours of waiting, "guix pull" failed with this message:
>
> srfi/srfi-1.scm:592:17: In procedure map1:
> Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(# [message: "build of
> `/gnu/store/v25y22k9
Hi Kei,
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Update: Please check out the new wip-gnome-updates branch of the Guix
> git repository for continued updates. The contents of the notabug.org
> link given above will be changed to a notice that says to do this.
Thank you very much for this huge effort. I've been p
Hello everyone,
With some help from both you and Jami developers, I finally managed
to build pjproject-jami, which means the hardest task has been
already done! Now I have to package restinio, which replaced restbed in
Jami. I have already a sketch of the package, but I encountered a
problem I don
Hello Danny,
Danny Milosavljevic ezt írta (időpont: 2019. nov.
4., H, 18:18):
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to package nesc which has some small tools written in Java.
> It compiles them using "javac" and then packs the result using "jar".
>
> If I want
>
> guix build --rounds=2 nesc
>
> to pass, how d
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Tanguy Le Carrour wrote:
Hi Guix!
I intended to ask this question later, but now that ungoogled-chromium
has been superseded by icecat, I find myself stuck!
Is it possible to package a single file? The "file" being a bash script or
a binary. Is there a package definition I
Hello,
Jan Wielkiewicz ezt írta (időpont:
2019. nov. 4., H, 21:48):
> Hello everyone,
>
> With some help from both you and Jami developers, I finally managed
> to build pjproject-jami, which means the hardest task has been
> already done! Now I have to package restinio, which replaced restbed in
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> I'm actually surprised you find it surprising! :)
> I can think of Simon, maybe Konrad(?) and myself who mentioned it
> before.
Yes, me too. I could add to Pierre's list of use cases, but I prefer to
shift the discussion to a higher level.
What we have been discussing
29 matches
Mail list logo
