On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:01:43AM +0900, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hello Pierre!
>
> Pierre Neidhardt writes:
>
> > True.
> >
> > I've been using Btrfs for my data for a little while and I'm very happy
> > with it.
> >
> > I wonder how Btrfs fares for a Guix system. In many ways, Guix
> > super
Dear Guix
As I'm still a newbie, I'm sending those patches for review before
submitting them to guix-patc...@gnu.org.
Thanks for reviewing!
--
Tanguy
--
Tanguy
>From b1a708198ea93c5a6d591d6b4ac864819de432e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "tan...@bioneland.org"
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:13:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Add Cookiecutter and its inputs
---
gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(
--
Tanguy
>From 3d244fab04f6de3dcdd888ce1e1877f8f6b2b0f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "tan...@bioneland.org"
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:17:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: Add Cookiecutter and its inputs
---
gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertio
--
Tanguy
>From dc07c609430e9e63dd4d87b71d84545db87d9f8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "tan...@bioneland.org"
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:05:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add Cookiecutter and its inputs
---
gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 23 +++
1 file changed, 23 inserti
--
Tanguy
>From 2d0e7649de9e34fd3dd73f78d00f6b9dde9acc4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "tan...@bioneland.org"
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:23:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add Cookiecutter and its inputs
---
gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 35 +++
1 file changed
Hello,
Tanguy Le Carrour ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 3.,
Csü 9:45):
> Dear Guix
>
> As I'm still a newbie, I'm sending those patches for review before
> submitting them to guix-patc...@gnu.org.
>
> Thanks for reviewing!
>
Guix patches is a patch review queue. Feel free to post them there. Plea
Hi Gábor!
Thanks for your answer.
Le 10/03, Gábor Boskovits a écrit :
> Guix patches is a patch review queue. Feel free to post them there. Please
> post the cover letter first to open a new issue, and post the rest to the
> assigned issue number.
I've just figured out that one could submit the
Tanguy,
Tanguy Le Carrour 写道：
I guess it must be a problem on my side as all the packages go
through
CI!?
No and yes but.
All packages do ‘go through CI’: ci.guix.gnu.org builds each new
package, and whenever that succeeds, everyone gets a nice
substitute for it.
However: we don't use CI
Hello,
Tanguy Le Carrour ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 3.,
Cs, 13:39):
> Hi Gábor!
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Le 10/03, Gábor Boskovits a écrit :
> > Guix patches is a patch review queue. Feel free to post them there.
> Please
> > post the cover letter first to open a new issue, and post th
Hi Tobias!
Le 10/03, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice a écrit :
> Tanguy Le Carrour 写道：
> > I guess it must be a problem on my side as all the packages go through
> > CI!?
>
> No and yes but.
>
> All packages do ‘go through CI’: ci.guix.gnu.org builds each new package,
> and whenever that succeeds, everyon
Le 10/03, Gábor Boskovits a écrit :
> Tanguy Le Carrour ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 3.,
> > I've just figured out that one could submit the package AND its
> > dependencies in one patch [1]. Is it easier to review than sending
> > 4 different patchs/emails?!
> >
> > [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to define an i686-linux package of gcc.
> Simply using the
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> #:system "i686-linux"
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>
> results in a bunch of
>
>
lisp.scm currently contains:
- Lisp compilers.
- Lisp libraries.
- A few (3-4) Lisp-based programs.
I suggest we move the lisp libraries to lisp-xyz.scm. It would also be
more consistent with what we do for other languages.
Thoughts?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
D
Hello Guix!
My name is Nardos, and I am an Outreachy participant from Indiana University,
Bloomington. I am a first time open source contributor hopeful. I am excite to
be here, but I will admit I am also a little nervous. I welcome feedback as I
am here to learn from all of you. I can be reach
< vagrantc> nckx: did you intentionally not update all the
linux-libre variables so that linux-libre-arm*
still use 5.2 ?
< sneek> vagrantc, nckx says: Yes. Not just for ARM. 5.3 is
untested on bare metal.
< vagrantc> nckx: not untested anymore ... i've tested it on both
x86_64
Asfaw, Nardos writes:
> My name is Nardos, and I am an Outreachy participant from Indiana
> University, Bloomington. I am a first time open source contributor
> hopeful. I am excite to be here, but I will admit I am also a little
> nervous. I welcome feedback as I am here to learn from all of yo
Hello Nardos,
Asfaw, Nardos ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 3., Cs, 18:13):
> Hello Guix!
>
> My name is Nardos, and I am an Outreachy participant from Indiana
> University, Bloomington. I am a first time open
> source contributor hopeful. I am excite to be here, but I will admit I am
> also a lit
On +2019-10-03 10:09:30 +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:01:43AM +0900, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> > Hello Pierre!
> >
> > Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> >
> > > True.
> > >
> > > I've been using Btrfs for my data for a little while and I'm very happy
> > > with it.
> > >
> >
Hello Pierre,
>> guix build --system=i686-linux -e '(@@ (gnu packages gcc) gcc)'
>>
>> produces a hash error.)
>>
>> Any clue?
>
> Friendly ping! :)
>
> Mathieu, I think you've got experience with cross-compilation on Guix,
> any clue about this?
I think the gcc packages defined in (gnu packa
20 matches
Mail list logo
