Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
>> #1 may have a simple fix. #2 less so. WDYT, Mathieu?
>
> #1 may have a simple fix but it would require to have the output of
> "connmanctl services" (as you requested) to better understand why the
> name is #f. Plus I cannot find a way to create a netwo
Another thing:
> The next step is to run
>
> ```shell
> make localmodconfig
> ```
>
> and note the output. Do note that the '.config' file is still empty.
> The output generally contains two types of warnings. The first start
> with "WARNING" and can actually be ignored in our case. The second
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:38:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I’ll create a ‘version-1.0.1’ branch with the aim of releasing the whole
> thing maybe tomorrow or at least by Tuesday.
>
If this does not go through the TP, can we send a download link for a
newer PO file adapted to current doc/g
Hi,
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" :
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:38:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I’ll create a ‘version-1.0.1’ branch with the aim of releasing the
> > whole thing maybe tomorrow or at least by Tuesday.
> >
>
> If this does not go through the TP, can we send a download
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:41:02PM +0200, Miguel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" :
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:38:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > > I’ll create a ‘version-1.0.1’ branch with the aim of releasing the
> > > whole thing maybe tomorrow or at least by Tuesday.
>
Hi,
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" :
> Thank you for explaining.
You're welcome. :)
> I prefer doing `msgmerge --previous --nowrap /path/to/old/de.po
> po/doc/guix-manual.pot > /new/de.po` to get the old fuzzy messages and
> all messages on a single line.
I disagree with TP's --nowrap policy for
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix' has been submitted
by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/guix/es.po
(We can arrange things so that in th
Hello Björn,
Björn Höfling writes:
[...]
>> 2) Cuirass
>
> On Guix days, we discussed the idea of using Postgresql as a backend.
Please do you remember the rationale behind this idea?
What is the issue with using sqlite?
Why a client/server approach vs an embedded database?
I don't have muc
Hi Efraim,
Efraim Flashner writes:
> I've cleaned up the blog post a bit and run it through a spell checker.
> I'm unsure about Linux-Libre vs linux-libre, regarding talking about the
> kernel and the package. I think I glossed over it well enough that I
> didn't actually get a custom kernel up
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> We could probably improve the cold-cache timings by adding synopses and
>> descriptions to the package cache that ‘guix pull’ builds in
>> ~/.config/guix/current/lib/guix/package.cache, but that would also make
>> that cache bigger. Not s
Dear,
I find a bit annoying 2 things when creating Docker images with `guix pack`.
1.
The name of the tar is given at the end of the command `guix pack`. If
you forget to track it, then you need to re-run `guix pack` (obviously
with the very same parameters) to get it again.
It is not super user-
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:29:56PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> I just want to point out an (IMO) easier way to provide a custom kernel
> configuration, that does not involve the "make-linux-libre" procedure:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:10:37PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Great work!
> This proved invaluable for me (and I'm sure for many others), thank you so
> much!
>
> Comments:
>
> > added in since I used replaced them in the extra-options keyword.
>
> Typo: "used replaced".
>
Ooops, looks l
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:13:02PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:38:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I’ll create a ‘version-1.0.1’ branch with the aim of releasing the whole
> > thing maybe tomorrow or at least by Tuesday.
> >
>
> If this does not go
Hi Marius,
Marius Bakke writes:
> I just want to point out an (IMO) easier way to provide a custom kernel
> configuration, that does not involve the "make-linux-libre" procedure:
>
> (define-public linux-libre/custom
> (package
> (inherit linux-libre)
> (native-inputs
> `(("kconfi
15 matches
Mail list logo
