mescc-tools-static hash mismatch on core-updates-next

2018-11-25 Thread Arun Isaac
I'm trying to build the core-updates-next branch. I'm getting the following hash mismatch error. Is someone else facing the same problem too, or is this something wrong on my side? Starting download of /gnu/store/07rakmdms7gc7nzzvmaxw4rzprb277wv-mescc-tools-static-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar

Re: Cyclic npm dependencies

2018-11-25 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:29:08PM +, Jelle Licht wrote: > >So in your example, I imagine an input chain like: > >node-glob 0.1 -> node-rimraf 0.1 -> node-glob 0.2 -> > node-rimraf 0.2 > >-> -> node-glob 1.0 -> node-rimraf 1.0 > >While *extremely*

Re: mescc-tools-static hash mismatch on core-updates-next

2018-11-25 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Arun Isaac writes: Hi! > I'm trying to build the core-updates-next branch. I'm getting the > following hash mismatch error. Is someone else facing the same problem > too, or is this something wrong on my side? Oops, I accidentally uploaded a newer (intermediate) tarball yesterday. Should be fixe

Re: mescc-tools-static hash mismatch on core-updates-next

2018-11-25 Thread Arun Isaac
>> I'm trying to build the core-updates-next branch. I'm getting the >> following hash mismatch error. Is someone else facing the same problem >> too, or is this something wrong on my side? > > Oops, I accidentally uploaded a newer (intermediate) tarball yesterday. > Should be fixed now. Can you

Re: Cyclic npm dependencies

2018-11-25 Thread swedebugia
On 2018-11-24 16:41, Jelle Licht wrote: Hey swedebugia, I will still send a more elaborate reply to the general npm-importer thread later this week, but we can assume that generally these recursive dependencies can be untangled by looking at the different versions of the dependencies. So in you

Bug in my WIP-npm-importer with blacklist

2018-11-25 Thread swedebugia
Hi I am still a novice in guile so I humbly ask for help with this error trying to get the blacklisting to work: sdb@komputilo ~$ ~/guix-tree/pre-inst-env guix import npm leaflet ice-9/boot-9.scm:222:17: In procedure map1: Syntax error: /home/sdb/guix-tree/guix/import/npm.scm:304:2: source exp

Should we rename qtoctave to octave and octave to octave-cli? (was Re: Octave & QtOctave)

2018-11-25 Thread Alex Vong
n...@n0.is writes: > names for packages are (mostly) random, although in some > cases following classiifcations (see python-*, r-*, ...). > I am thinking that should we rename qtoctave to octave and octave to octave-cli (or octave-minimal)? Firstly, a new user wanting to install octave will proba

Re: Fixing LibreOffice on ‘core-updates’

2018-11-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Heya, Marius Bakke skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Hello Guix, >> >> As briefly discussed with Marius on IRC, we both tried to fix >> LibreOffice on ‘core-updates’. The initial problem is that some of the >> libraries it depends on fail to build with the new Boost. >> >>

Re: Bug in my WIP-npm-importer with blacklist

2018-11-25 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello, I had a look at that. You should not need the if there, just 'return' the test of the if. If has a form (if test conseqent alternate), alternate is optional and returns the value of the evaluated branch (consequent or alternate). This gives you a syntax error, as the mandatory consequent ex

Re: Should we rename qtoctave to octave and octave to octave-cli? (was Re: Octave & QtOctave)

2018-11-25 Thread Brett Gilio
Alex Vong writes: > n...@n0.is writes: > >> names for packages are (mostly) random, although in some >> cases following classiifcations (see python-*, r-*, ...). >> > I am thinking that should we rename qtoctave to octave and octave to > octave-cli (or octave-minimal)? > > Firstly, a new user wa

Re: Getting ‘core-updates’ merged

2018-11-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Danny, Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:52:42 +0100 > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> -- >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/tmp/guix-build-rust-1.22.1.drv-0/rustc-1.22.1-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/issue-26092.s

Re: Octave & QtOctave

2018-11-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, n...@n0.is skribis: > names for packages are (mostly) random, although in some > cases following classiifcations (see python-*, r-*, ...). That randomness is very limited in practice, if I may. :-) https://gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Package-Naming.html “qtoctave” was a

Re: 01/02: gnu: rhythmbox: Update hash of patch.

2018-11-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Mark, guix-comm...@gnu.org skribis: > commit e1d97c4efc42a661bd2772041371303e4070aa4f > Author: Mark H Weaver > Date: Mon Nov 5 04:04:45 2018 -0500 > > gnu: rhythmbox: Update hash of patch. > > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (rhythmbox)[source]: Update hash of the applied > pa

Re: Fixing LibreOffice on ‘core-updates’

2018-11-25 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:26:37 +0100, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) a écrit : > Heya, > > Marius Bakke skribis: > > > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > > >> Hello Guix, > >> > >> As briefly discussed with Marius on IRC, we both tried to fix > >> LibreOffice on ‘core-updates’. The ini

Re: Fixing LibreOffice on ‘core-updates’

2018-11-25 Thread Marius Bakke
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Heya, > > Marius Bakke skribis: > >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >>> Hello Guix, >>> >>> As briefly discussed with Marius on IRC, we both tried to fix >>> LibreOffice on ‘core-updates’. The initial problem is that some of the >>> libraries i

Re: 01/02: gnu: rhythmbox: Update hash of patch.

2018-11-25 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Ludovic, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > guix-comm...@gnu.org skribis: > >> commit e1d97c4efc42a661bd2772041371303e4070aa4f >> Author: Mark H Weaver >> Date: Mon Nov 5 04:04:45 2018 -0500 >> >> gnu: rhythmbox: Update hash of patch. >> >> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (rhyth

Re: Outreachy project infrastructure

2018-11-25 Thread Björn Höfling
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:04:02 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Björn Höfling writes: > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:18:54 -0300 > > Laura Lazzati wrote: > > > >> Hi again! > >> > >> I went through past emails and this new ones. > >> > >> In a previous mail, Bjorn suggested using the wiki - > >>

Re: Outreachy project infrastructure

2018-11-25 Thread Laura Lazzati
> > Laura, I saw you already have an account for libreplanet. Feel free to > go on editing this page. I really just copy/pasted Ricardos email here. > > Great! Yes, I created it to edit the file about attending to FOSDEM, was that wrong? And thanks! Regards :) Laura

Re: util-linux and perl rename

2018-11-25 Thread Alex Vong
Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Wilms writes: > Hi Guix! > > I already had a "rename" binary via util-linux. Then I installed the > package "rename", resulting in another "rename" binary, as I prefer > the Perl version. This was a success in that I got what I wanted. > > However, should this name clash be