Re: push right for trivial commits

Hi Ludo, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi Alex, > > Alex Vong skribis: > >> I finally have my savannah account recovered after forgetting about it >> for a year[0]. Can I have push right for trivial commits (e.g. version >> bumps)? Do I need to give my GPG key? > > I’ve added you to t

Re: Lisp libraries: Other variants? (CCL, CLisp, etc.)

The point of pre-compiling for SBCL, ECL, etc. is that is saves time to the user. If you want the source-only Common Lisp library which would work across all implementations (as long as they are supported), you can install the "cl-" prefixed package. Then the Common Lisp compiler invoked by the us

Re: push right for trivial commits

Alex Vong transcribed 1.5K bytes: > Hi Ludo, > > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > Alex Vong skribis: > > > >> I finally have my savannah account recovered after forgetting about it > >> for a year[0]. Can I have push right for trivial commits (e.g. version > >> bumps

Re: New detailed troubleshooting section in the manual

It worked :) Thank you! Regards! Laura

[PATCH][WIP] Elogind update

Hello, Guix. As I announced, here is patch that let's us update elogind. Note: This patch is work in progress. Please do not mind the lack of proper commit message. Since I expect more changes to this patch, I did not bother writing it. As I far as I know, the last work on elogind is by Marius

Packaging ufw

Hi I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it? If not I'm going to try. -- Cheers Swedebugia

[PATCH]:gnu:add ne:the nice editor

hi all, This patch was sent to guix-patches but i read in the web site that since 2017 guix-devel replace it to submit patch. guy From 1ec45eaa225e7203a98b36cddb7d42db418b773b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: guy fleury Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 10:51:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu:add ne:the nice ed

[Cuirass] Missing database indexes?

Hello! I was investigating the slowness of our /api/latestbuilds requests on berlin. I found that if we have just the two indexes currently defined in ‘schema.sql’, basically everything involves a table scan: --8<---cut here---start->8--- sqlite> EXPLAIN QUERY

Re: Packaging ufw

On 2018-11-10 17:01, swedebugia wrote: Hi I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it? If not I'm going to try. Where should it be? In networking.scm or python.scm? We have no other firewall packages judging from my emacs-guix regex search. -- Cheers Swedebugia

Re: Packaging ufw

swedebugia writes: > On 2018-11-10 17:01, swedebugia wrote: >> Hi >> >> I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it? >> >> If not I'm going to try. >> > Where should it be? In networking.scm or python.scm? > > We have no other firewall packages judging from my emacs-guix regex search.

Re: Packaging ufw

Well, we have iptables, but ufw would probably not fit there :p -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH]:gnu:add ne:the nice editor

Hi guy, > This patch was sent to guix-patches but i read in the web site that > since 2017 guix-devel replace it to submit patch. It’s the other way around :) Patches should better be sent to guix-patches. -- Ricardo

Re: [PATCH]:gnu:add ne:the nice editor

Thanks! Guy Le 10 nov. 2018 21:26, "Ricardo Wurmus" a écrit : > > Hi guy, > > > This patch was sent to guix-patches but i read in the web site that > > since 2017 guix-devel replace it to submit patch. > > It’s the other way around :) Patches should better be sent to > guix-patches. > > -- > Ric

Re: [Cuirass] Missing database indexes?

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 18:33:23 +0100 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Now, ‘db-get-builds’ in Cuirass uses a more complex query. In > particular, it orders things, very roughly along these lines: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > sqlite> EXPLAIN QUERY P

Re: Packaging ufw

Hi On 2018-11-10 19:24, Brett Gilio wrote: swedebugia writes: On 2018-11-10 17:01, swedebugia wrote: Hi I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it? If not I'm going to try. Where should it be? In networking.scm or python.scm? We have no other firewall packages judging from my

Re: Packaging ufw

Hi, On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:42:38 +0100 swedebugia wrote: > I need help. > > It fails with > > starting phase `install' > running "python setup.py" with command "install" and parameters > ("--prefix=/gnu/store/v8kzgqs1jdfg7wzqr9c02719ada6x8bm-ufw-0.35" > "--single-version-externally-managed"

Re: New detailed troubleshooting section in the manual

Good to hear it wasn't just use then... I guess maybe we should clarify the documentation. Alex On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, 15:48 Laura Lazzati It worked :) > Thank you! > > Regards! > Laura > > >

GNOME & Tracker-Sparql

Hi all, I hate to be a nuissance: I remember about a month ago wondering when we could get Tracker-Sparql upgraded, and there was some great input. There seemed to be a delay in the GNOME channel carrying many updates to our GNOME environment. I was digging through our gnome.scm module and realize

Re: Packaging ufw

> I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it? No, possibly because it doesn't add much when one has iptables and a guix configuration script for it. > We have no other firewall packages judging from my emacs-guix regex > search. We have iptables and ebtables and I suggest you consider

Weird lint warning

$ ./pre-inst-env guix lint ufw guix lint: warning: failed to load '(gnu packages #{.#python}#)': no code for module (gnu packages #{.#python}#) Does anyone know what this means? -- Cheers Swedebugia